Appworthy
Google Play
Version 1.1.4 · 2018-11-14
No release notes were provided for this version.
Google Play rating4.2★41.3K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app purchases
Age4+Store age rating
CategoryGames
DeveloperRedAntz
What we found
Full reportToo little checked to say Only 400 reviews read, too few to say.
Money
- Free to download · in-app purchases. Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices.
- If you subscribe through the store, cancel in Google Play → Payments & subscriptions → Subscriptions. Deleting the app doesn’t cancel a subscription.
From our automated analysis, 31 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 1.1.4 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 1.1.4, updated 2018-11-14.
Preview
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
About this app
Over 3 MILLION PANDA JUMP LOVERS!
He never wanted to hurt anybody, but they came and the survival of the panda population was at stake...
Keep the cute panda jumping to fight against angry birds, crazy monkeys, fire foxes, giant kongs and their troops
WHAT'S NEW? (Yes, we listened!)
- 4 season themes
- Get the panda boosted with 1 more life, double shield, etc.
- New enemies & obstacles
- Global leaderboard & achievement
- Tons of missions
- Performance & game balance improved
- HD/SD option
HOW TO PLAY (Yeah, still very simple!):
- Tap to jump and attack
- Hit 3 of a kind to be invincible
- Avoid obstacles
- A shield blocks one hit
Several FC/Crash issues had been reported recently from low devices such as: Samsung Galaxy Y, Samsung Galaxy Y Duos, Samsung Galaxy Ace, Samsung Galaxy Ace Duos, Samsung Galaxy Mini, Samsung Galaxy Pocket.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The full report
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings and evidence
This assessment published no findings. That is a statement about what the evidence we had could show, not a clearance of the app.
What reviewers report
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
Measurements
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
From store data and reviews
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
No theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
Under 65% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the app package we scanned
Android package 1.1.4, scanned 31 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Sensitive permissions
None requested
Counted against a fixed list of eighteen sensitive Android permissions: sixteen runtime permissions, among them location, camera, microphone, contacts and SMS, and two the user must switch on in system settings, drawing over other apps and usage access. Requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
None found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
How we know
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
Versions and dates analysed
This analysis describes version 1.1.4 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 1.1.4, updated 2018-11-14.
Store update history
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Assessment record
- Status
- Automated analysis
- App identifier
panda-jump-seasons- Assessment date
- 31 Oct 2026
- Sources used
- 4 independent signals: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest
- Reviews read
- 400
- Package examined
- Android · 1.1.4 · scanned 31 Oct 2026
- Human inspection
- Not completed
Assessed 2026-10-31 from 400 user reviews and the app's package.
How we know
- Measurement vocabulary
- 1.4
How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-31 Version analyzed: 1.1.44 independent signals400 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.14Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest. Not yet checked: the store listing and the store privacy disclosure.
Store facts
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
Google Play
- Store rating
- 4.18 ★ · 41,332 ratings
- Version
- 1.1.4
- Updated
- 14 Nov 2018
- Price
- Free · In-app purchases
- Age rating
- 4+
- Size
- Not supplied
- Developer
- RedAntz
- Category
- Games
- Listing price
- Free · In-app purchases
Purchases the store lists
What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices.
Method and limits
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Limits of this report
- A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
- Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
- Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
- A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.
Request a correction
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.