Some warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 400 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 31 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.0.9 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 1.0.9, updated 2023-10-13.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
For millions of PANDA JUMP fans around the world - we just can’t thank you enough for your amazing continued support!
From the creators of NINJA REVENGE, ZOMBIE AGE and PANDA JUMP!
Yeah! The CUTE PANDA is back with even more AWESOMENESS!
* RUN as far as you can!
* DODGE the oncoming obstacles & enemies
* RIDE on the angry boar
* FLY with the flappy bird
FEATURES
- Fast pace and simple control
- Unique cartoon style graphic
- Power-ups, utilities and so much mores
- Tons of missions
- Dozens of panda costumes
- Global & friend leaderboards
- Excellent multiplier scoring system
- Both HD/SD are supported
WARNING: Your reflexes & agility will be extremely tested!
LIKE REDANTZ ON FACEBOOK! https://www.facebook.com/redantzstudio…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 3 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), Meta Audience Network, Unity Ads
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:51ae8c40250bdc6ba098c8605fd941702818a4e88e1a356b4a773859516f69a0Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:51ae8c40250bdc6ba098c8605fd941702818a4e88e1a356b4a773859516f69a0No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.0.9, scanned 31 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.0.9 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 1.0.9, updated 2023-10-13.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
panda-runAssessed 2026-10-31 from 400 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.