Some warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 400 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 24 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 4.1.9 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 4.1.9, updated 2026-02-02.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Stop Uploading Your Private Docs to the Cloud.
Merge, Scan, and Sign PDFs 100% Offline. Your data never leaves your phone.
Tired of "free" PDF tools that make you wait for slow uploads, spam your email, or store your sensitive bank statements on their servers? PDF Merge: Scan & Sign is the "Local-First" office suite built for speed, privacy, and zero compromises.
Whether you are a student rushing a deadline or a professional signing a contract, get it done instantly without needing Wi-Fi or a subscription.
🛡️ Why Millions Choose Our "Offline-First" Suite:
🔒 Absolute Privacy: We have no servers. Your IDs, contracts, and medical records stay on your device.
⚡ Blazing Speed: No uploading. No downloading. Merge 50+ pages in under 2 seconds.
✈️ Works Anywhere: Airplane mode? Subway? Remote site? Your office is now truly in your pocket.
🚫 Zero Friction: No account sign-ups.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
The app's own text says: "You have reached the free daily limit of %1$d PDF operations. Upgrade to Premium for unlimited processing!"
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:a7bcb375f691cf8dd66d9c0f3384c02a9fa79c2b88e42018a1144235887c6e62Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "One-Time Purchase"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
sha256:a7bcb375f691cf8dd66d9c0f3384c02a9fa79c2b88e42018a1144235887c6e62The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Watch Ad to Continue Once"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:a7bcb375f691cf8dd66d9c0f3384c02a9fa79c2b88e42018a1144235887c6e62Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:a7bcb375f691cf8dd66d9c0f3384c02a9fa79c2b88e42018a1144235887c6e62Offers a trial ("Limited time only") and states no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:a7bcb375f691cf8dd66d9c0f3384c02a9fa79c2b88e42018a1144235887c6e62The app's own text says: "Thanks for your interest. We will share more once you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:a7bcb375f691cf8dd66d9c0f3384c02a9fa79c2b88e42018a1144235887c6e62No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 4.1.9, scanned 24 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 4.1.9 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 4.1.9, updated 2026-02-02.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
pdf-mergeAssessed 2026-10-24 from 400 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.