📘 PDF ProX: PDF Reader & Editor – Read, Edit, Convert, Scan and Manage PDF F…
Office Suite ProNo specific positive published.
From our automated analysis, 10 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.0.1-Office of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-10 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.0.2-Office, updated 2026-10-08.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 2.0.1-Office, not the version now listed on the store.
The developer’s release notes for the newer versions, where we hold them, are in Versions and dates analysed.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
📘 PDF ProX: PDF Reader & Editor – Read, Edit, Convert, Scan and Manage PDF Files
PDF ProX is an all-in-one PDF reader, PDF viewer, PDF editor, PDF converter and PDF scanner for Android. Open PDF files with a fast PDF opener, view documents, edit content, convert files, scan documents and manage PDFs with ease.
Whether you're reading study notes, reviewing business documents, opening eBooks or managing office files, this PDF reader provides everything you need to stay productive.
📖 Fast PDF Reader & PDF Viewer
• Open PDF files with a high-quality viewer.
• View PDF documents with smooth scrolling and clear rendering.
• Zoom in and out for comfortable reading.
• Jump directly to any page for quick navigation.
• Search text inside PDF files in seconds.
• Read contracts, reports, manuals, study materials and eBooks easily.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:e57c370143a521586741f75bca0bcc70f29deb0d67d81c0dc28ff22f5d29662eOpen observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 21 distinct reviewers (1.6% of 1347 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
1,347 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
poor too many ads. make you frustrated
too many adverts
to much ad's bro
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
Android package 2.0.1-Office, scanned 7 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.0.1-Office of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-10 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 2.0.2-Office, updated 2026-10-08.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 2.0.1-Office, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
No release notes were provided for this version.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
pdf-proxAssessed 2026-10-10 from 1,347 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.