Some warnings 3 things we found but could not confirm. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 615 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 11.3.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 11.3.1, updated 2026-10-06.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Transform your PDFs. Get your work done quickly with Xodo's all-in-one PDF editor and reader with 30+ features - all available on your iPhone or iPad. Safely store and sync your files on your iCloud, OneDrive, Google Drive and Dropbox so you can easily view, edit, convert, e-sign and compress your files anytime, anywhere on your device.
Edit PDFs:
Intuitive, easy-to-use PDF editor for any user in mind.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 8 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:4b4fdbd7899ab0dddad0aa30bf9d5c516d1fd714d9b5e45eacfe7ae2c6f2ab89The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Deadline pressure in the app's own copy: "Limited Time Offer"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own purchase copy attaches a deadline to buying — a countdown, 'offer ends in', 'limited time' — or ships a countdown view on a purchase-screen layout.
Package artefact
sha256:4b4fdbd7899ab0dddad0aa30bf9d5c516d1fd714d9b5e45eacfe7ae2c6f2ab89The app's own text says: "Billed annually. Cancel anytime on Google Play. Subscription automatically renews until you cancel."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:4b4fdbd7899ab0dddad0aa30bf9d5c516d1fd714d9b5e45eacfe7ae2c6f2ab89The app's own text says: "Add annotation in reading mode with Xodo Mobile subscription"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Package artefact
sha256:4b4fdbd7899ab0dddad0aa30bf9d5c516d1fd714d9b5e45eacfe7ae2c6f2ab89The app's own text says: "Access is not required to view and edit files shared to Xodo and you can continue opening files in Xodo using the System Picker."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:4b4fdbd7899ab0dddad0aa30bf9d5c516d1fd714d9b5e45eacfe7ae2c6f2ab89The app's own text says: "Please wait for cloud files to download…"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:4b4fdbd7899ab0dddad0aa30bf9d5c516d1fd714d9b5e45eacfe7ae2c6f2ab89Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 11.3.1, scanned 21 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 11.3.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 11.3.1, updated 2026-10-06.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
- A Brand-New Document Viewer Menu: Enjoy a cleaner, more intuitive menu with quicker access to the tools you use most - Bug Fixes and Improvements
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
pdf-reader-and-editor-apple-805075929Assessed 2026-10-30 from 615 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.