Appworthy

Pep AI: GLP-1 Peptide Tracker

GLP1 Shot & Dose Tracker

Zode Development LLC
Download on theApp Store
App Store rating4.7★4K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app $3.99–$49.99
Age17+Store age rating
Size148 MBiPhone download
CategoryHealth & Fitness
DeveloperZode Development LLC

What we found

Full report

Too little checked to say Only 133 reviews read, too few to say.

Money

  • Free to download · in-app purchases $3.99–$49.99 (8 listed; the App Store shows at most 10). Weekly plan $3.99 (about $207 a year); monthly plan $9.99 (about $120 a year); yearly plans $29.99, $39.99, $44.99 and $49.99. The other purchases’ names don’t say how often they bill.
  • If you subscribe through the store, cancel in iPhone Settings → your name → Subscriptions. Deleting the app doesn’t cancel a subscription.

From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026.

This analysis describes version 4.0.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .

The store currently lists version 4.0.4, updated 2026-10-16.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Pep AI is the GLP-1 and Peptide tracker for shots, nutrition, side effects, weight, wellness, and everything in between.

Use Pep AI for Zepbound®, Wegovy®, Ozempic®, Mounjaro®, Foundayo®, semaglutide, tirzepatide, oral GLP-1s, peptides, and weekly injection routines.

GLP-1 and Peptide tracking shouldn’t mean scattered notes, forgotten injection sites, missed protein goals, and trying to remember how you felt after your last dose. Pep AI brings your routine together so you can stay consistent and understand your progress over time.

NEW IN PEP AI 4.0

• A completely redesigned app: new Home, Dose and Progress screens

• Arlo, your companion, with friendlier reminders that fit your day

• Home Screen widgets, Live Activities and a redesigned Apple Watch app

• Community groups to share progress with others on the same journey

• In-app Help articles for every feature…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

No findings published
This assessment published no findings. That is a statement about what the evidence we had could show, not a clearance of the app.

What reviewers report

133 reviews read · 0 review-based observations

No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.

Measurements

5 measured · 3 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
No theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.

Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 27 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 4.0.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .

The store currently lists version 4.0.4, updated 2026-10-16.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

App Store

Version 4.0.4 · 2026-10-16
• We've removed the dose calculator. App Store rules only allow dose calculators from approved sources like drug makers, pharmacies and hospitals, so we've taken it out to keep Pep AI available. • Save community polls and find them again on your new Saved Polls page. • Tap the streak icon in the header to see your streak at a glance. • Units, body orientation and dose units now live together in Personalization. • A cleaner header in community groups, and softer headers across the app. • Fixed buttons that were hard to see in dark mode. • Stability and reliability improvements.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
pep-ai
Assessment date
27 Oct 2026
Sources used
3 independent signals: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
133
Package examined
No package scan
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-27 from 133 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-27 Version analyzed: 4.0.43 independent signals133 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.

Store facts

App Store

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

App Store

Store rating
4.73 ★ · 3,978 ratings
Version
4.0.4
Updated
16 Oct 2026
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
17+
Size
148 MB
Open in App Store
Developer
Zode Development LLC
Category
Health & Fitness
Listing price
Free · In-app purchases

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells

From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.

Subscriptions7
Pep Week UpdatedWeekly$3.99
Pep Month UpdatedMonthly$9.99
Pep Year UpdatedYearly$39.99
Pep AI YearlyYearly$29.99
Pep Year UpdatedYearly$44.99
Pep Year UpdatedYearly$29.99
Pep Year SubscriptionYearly$49.99
Show 1 more purchase we couldn’t categorise

These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.

Pep Discount UpdatedTerm not stated$29.99
This list is cut off. Apple shows at most 10 in-app purchases, and this app is at the limit — so it very likely sells more than we can see.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.
Review thresholds Read the methodology For developers

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.

Report a factual error — free Email a correction