Nothing published. That is not a guarantee the app is problem-free.
No specific positive published.
From our automated analysis, 16 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 1.21.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-16 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.21.0, updated 2025-07-07.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Swipick: Your Ultimate Camera Roll Organizer
Tired of endlessly scrolling through your camera roll, trying to find that one special photo? Say hello to Swipick, the app that revolutionizes the way you manage your memories.
Why Swipick?
Sure, there are other apps that claim to tidy up your photo library. But we promise, Swipick is different. We've crafted an experience that's not just effective but also enjoyable. Journey through your camera roll month by month, sort through photos, videos, screenshots - you name it. With Swipick, you take control: decide what stays and what goes, all with a simple swipe.
How It Works:
Swipe Right: Keep that precious memory.
Swipe Left: Say goodbye to clutter.
Swipe Up: Check favorite photo.
Made a mistake? Tap on a photo to undo.
Review your decisions before finalizing.
And don't worry about losing your place.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (1.9% of 260 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
260 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Swipe pic review — Its Only giving you 25pics a day and its boring and 🥺🥺🥺you need preamum access to use more pics there are to many adds
Swipick was an all right app please read — I tried this app after seeing tons of ads on it. I thought well this should help me clear up some storage on my phone fun fact you are limited to 25 swipes I expected this app to be easier to use…
not worth it — waste of storage. first of all, i don’t know what moron would pay money just to delete photos from this app, when you can do it for free in your camera roll. there is an ad or pop up every two seconds, and it takes an…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.21.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-16 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.21.0, updated 2025-07-07.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Improvements and bug fixes to make cleaning your gallery even easier. Remember: swipe every day to keep the clutter away!
Appworthy
photo-cleaner-apple-6475566318Assessed 2026-10-16 from 260 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.