No specific positive published.
From our automated analysis, 8 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 045 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-08 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 045, updated 2026-07-27.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Tap to shoot bullets and take down your enemies!
Each shot’s recoil propels your gun—master the kickback to move, dodge, and conquer every level!
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 10 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager) and 6 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:5cfdf1436fe476fbabe09233ebc00e2f9b3daea63041e4991094e2ade91d7e97Aggressive ad load: raised by 60 distinct reviewers (11.7% of 515 reviews scanned)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:5cfdf1436fe476fbabe09233ebc00e2f9b3daea63041e4991094e2ade91d7e97515 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Raised by 60 distinct reviewers — 11.7% of the 515 reviews scanned on this store leg (Google Play).
fun but way to many ads
Way too many ads. Levels can take only 5-10 seconds, and you get an ad after every other level. Uninstalled almost immediately.
I liked it, it was relaxing.. But after every round comes an annoying ad... So I had to delete the app... For that half a star... The ads are ruining the game...
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
Android package 045, scanned 3 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 045 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-08 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 045, updated 2026-07-27.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
pistol-duel-google-com-kayac-pistolduelAssessed 2026-10-08 from 515 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.