Some warnings 4 things we found but could not confirm. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 31 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 25 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 1.900 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store lists the version as varying by device, updated 2026-07-20.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
🐍 Slide back in time with Pixel Snake, a fresh take on the beloved classic! Remember the iconic snake game from the golden age of mobile phones?
📱 We've captured that simple, addictive magic and supercharged it with vibrant pixel art and modern features!
Get ready to guide your super-hungry pixel snake 🐛 on an epic quest for dots! Gobble them up to grow longer and longer, dodging obstacles and chasing that unbeatable high score
🏆.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Watch a short video to unlock Settings, or upgrade to Premium for unlimited access!"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:6e04fa394254634df5b46fc99b68d173993f932ce938621cfaf90da5abb514ffSells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:6e04fa394254634df5b46fc99b68d173993f932ce938621cfaf90da5abb514ffThe app's own text says: "Premium"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Package artefact
sha256:6e04fa394254634df5b46fc99b68d173993f932ce938621cfaf90da5abb514ffThe app's own text says: "No ads are available right now. Please try again later or consider upgrading to Premium for unlimited access!"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Package artefact
sha256:6e04fa394254634df5b46fc99b68d173993f932ce938621cfaf90da5abb514ffThe app's own text says: "If you uninstall and reinstall the game, a new identifier will be generated. This means your previous nickname and global ranking scores will not be automatically associated with this new installation."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Package artefact
sha256:6e04fa394254634df5b46fc99b68d173993f932ce938621cfaf90da5abb514ffThe app's own text says: "Thanks for your interest. We will share more once you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:6e04fa394254634df5b46fc99b68d173993f932ce938621cfaf90da5abb514ffNothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.900, scanned 25 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.900 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store lists the version as varying by device, updated 2026-07-20.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
pixel-snakeAssessed 2026-10-25 from 31 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.