Create a stunning intro video with PixelFlow intro maker just by customizing…
PixelFlow Tech Private LimitedSome warnings 5 things we found but could not confirm. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 2.7.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 2.7.0, updated 2026-01-05.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Create a stunning intro video with PixelFlow intro maker just by customizing intro templates to increase video engagement. Quick and Easy to use.
PixelFlow app helps you create engaging & professional Intro video, Outro (end screen animation), title animation, clips or text on video animation for your brand, Gaming YT channel or Social Media platforms just in minutes. It is a right solution to edit text animations, animated video posts and making intro videos. It has well designed high-quality intro templates which are easily customizable with all types of backgrounds, fonts and music.
Whether you're a content creator, a professional marketer, a small business owner, or simply looking to add text & logo animation to your videos, PixelFlow Intro Maker is the perfect tool for you.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Loading an AD please wait"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:2e581c8d34fc547b3fef6e6a6fd29feac0556a3331ffbee0c9111b100b988459The app's own text says: "You will receive a notification from the google play store as soon as transaction is successful."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:2e581c8d34fc547b3fef6e6a6fd29feac0556a3331ffbee0c9111b100b988459Sells a randomised reward (""%1$s" copied to clipboard.") and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app sells randomised rewards — crates, chests, packs, pulls — and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in its own text, so what the money buys is unknowable before paying.
Package artefact
sha256:2e581c8d34fc547b3fef6e6a6fd29feac0556a3331ffbee0c9111b100b988459The app's own text says: "Congratulations, All premium features unlocked for a 'singe render'"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Package artefact
sha256:2e581c8d34fc547b3fef6e6a6fd29feac0556a3331ffbee0c9111b100b988459The app's own text says: "Become a PixelFlow Pro member to unlock this Template"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Package artefact
sha256:2e581c8d34fc547b3fef6e6a6fd29feac0556a3331ffbee0c9111b100b988459The app's own text says: "Logged in as: %1$s"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Package artefact
sha256:2e581c8d34fc547b3fef6e6a6fd29feac0556a3331ffbee0c9111b100b988459The app's own text says: "Not you?"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:2e581c8d34fc547b3fef6e6a6fd29feac0556a3331ffbee0c9111b100b988459The app's own text says: "Download from library"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:2e581c8d34fc547b3fef6e6a6fd29feac0556a3331ffbee0c9111b100b988459Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 2.7.0, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.7.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 2.7.0, updated 2026-01-05.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
pixelflowAssessed 2026-10-26 from 400 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.