Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.

Plantum - AI Plant Identifier

Care Guide and Identification

AIBY
No findings published
App Store rating4.6★119.4K ratings
PriceFreeListed price
Age4+Store age rating
Size109 MBiPhone download
CategoryEducation
DeveloperAIBY

At a glance

Full report

Things to watch for 0

Nothing published. That is not a guarantee the app is problem-free.

Positives 0

No specific positive published.

From our automated analysis, 8 Oct 2026.

This analysis describes version 6.21 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-08 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 6.21, updated 2026-09-02.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Identify plants in seconds with Plantum — your fast and accurate plant identifier.

What Can Plantum Do?

► Recognize over 40,000 natural objects.

Try taking a picture of a tree in the park and recognizing it with our plant scanner. You won’t be able to stop once you get a taste of our instantaneous plant identification. With our extensive database, you can identify plants and impress your friends on your next walk in the park. You can also search for a plant by its name or set Filters and discover the green pets that suit you best.

► Work as a plant disease identifier

No matter how hard you try, your plants may still get sick. Don’t ignore early symptoms, and use Plantum’s Diagnose to learn what disease your plant is suffering from. You’ll get an instant plant diagnosis and a list of treatment options, along with plant health advice.

► Share plant care advice…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

0 published · 4 shown, not confirmed

One source only — shown, not confirmed 4

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Trial converts to a charge

One source only

Trial converts to a charge: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (1.6% of 503 reviews scanned)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From App Store reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The free trial demands a payment method up front and/or rolls into a paid subscription with no usable warning.

Open evidence

Hard to cancel

One source only

Hard to cancel: raised by 20 distinct reviewers (4.0% of 503 reviews scanned)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From App Store reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.

Open evidence

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app

One source only

Misleading advertising: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (1.2% of 503 reviews scanned)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From App Store reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.

Open evidence

Reports of unexpected charges

One source only

Surprise charges: raised by 25 distinct reviewers (5.0% of 503 reviews scanned)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From App Store reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

A large number of reviewers report being charged when they did not expect it — including being charged after cancelling during a free trial, or when a trial turned into a paid plan without warning. We cannot see anyone's billing, so this is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.

Open evidence

Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.

What reviewers report

503 reviews read · 4 review-based observations

503 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Trial converts to a charge

Shown, not confirmed

SHADY SHADY company — Despite canceling during the free trial period keeps charging my credit card every week !!!!!! Update on 4/1 Contrary to what they have responded, despite canceling the subscription the same day as I started ( while…

1★ · App Store · 2026-04-01

Misread plants and double charged — I tried the 1 week free trial, got charged immediately instead of after the first week. I scanned a plant in my yard and it identified it as wild cabbage when it was clearly milk thistle, so I decided…

1★ · App Store · 2026-02-20

Impossible to cancel — I signed up for a free trial and forgot to cancel before the charge period. I then went to cancel after the first charge and found it is virtually impossible. In fact, I am still trying. The FAQs tell you to cancel…

1★ · App Store · 2025-08-17

Hard to cancel

Shown, not confirmed

Needs subscription — I enjoyed using the free version of this app. I only have one plant so it was nice to just get some info about it. Now every time I open the app, it pops up a screen telling me to pay $70 a year for the premium…

1★ · App Store · 2026-10-08

No Longer Free — Hit cancel hidden top right. Now it cycles over and over pop ups to buy. Hit cancel. Pops right back up deletes your photo. Hit cancel. Take photo. Pops up deletes photo. Will not let you use the app without paying a…

1★ · App Store · 2026-06-23

Plantum you can’t cancel — I have tried to cancel this subscription. Even with google I cannot figure out how to do this. They are deceptive with this.

2★ · App Store · 2025-11-03

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app

Shown, not confirmed

Meh! — So far it has told me nothing, I feel that advertising is somewhat misleading.

1★ · App Store · 2025-04-25

Not Free — As I am looking for a free app to help with my plants I am rating all apps that advertise free but require a subscription. Hope my hard work helps others and prevents them the frustration of dealing with false advertising

1★ · App Store · 2024-08-18

Not what was advertised. — The advertisement showed scanning a plant and a cool thing like add milk, coffee etc popped up. I couldn’t try the app without subscribing to it. The “3 day trial” would make me sign up at a higher price. So I…

1★ · App Store · 2024-07-26

Reports of unexpected charges

Shown, not confirmed

SHADY SHADY company — Despite canceling during the free trial period keeps charging my credit card every week !!!!!! Update on 4/1 Contrary to what they have responded, despite canceling the subscription the same day as I started ( while…

1★ · App Store · 2026-04-01

Misread plants and double charged — I tried the 1 week free trial, got charged immediately instead of after the first week. I scanned a plant in my yard and it identified it as wild cabbage when it was clearly milk thistle, so I decided…

1★ · App Store · 2026-02-20

HIDDEN CHARGES — I went to sign up for what I thought was a monthly charge when I was prompted to pay what I thought would be a one time charge of $49.99 only to learn the app was charging me $6.99 every WEEK on top of the lifetime charge…

1★ · App Store · 2025-12-17

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

5 measured · 3 not assessed

Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
3 or more themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.

Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app

Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 8 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 6.21 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-08 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 6.21, updated 2026-09-02.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

App Store

Version 6.21 · 2026-09-02
Hello, nature lovers! The new version has arrived! Here’s what we have in store for you: – Polished design for a more enjoyable app experience – Minor bugs were detected and fixed Stay tuned for more updates in the next version! Sincerely yours, Plantum team

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
plantum-apple-1476047194
Assessment date
8 Oct 2026
Sources used
3 independent signals: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
503
Package examined
No package scan
Measurement vocabulary
1.4
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-08 from 503 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-08 Version analyzed: 6.213 independent signals503 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.

Store facts

App Store

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

App Store

Store rating
4.59 ★ · 119,439 ratings
Version
6.21
Updated
2 Sep 2026
Price
Free
Age rating
4+
Size
109 MB
Open in App Store
Developer
AIBY
Category
Education
Listing price
Free

No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.