Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 263 reviews, the Android app’s code and the store listing.
From our automated analysis, 24 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.0.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 1.0.1, updated 2026-10-08.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Guess the Words, Master the Trivia, and Win Amazing Rewards!
Welcome to Play N Guess, the trivia platform where your knowledge and passion for quiz lead to exciting prizes! Whether you can love answering fun everyday quizzes, Play N Guess is designed to turn your skills into fantastic rewards.
### Key Features:
🎵 Answer simple, hilarious trivia questions.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:2c5397b1776b4615e61115e55bf3bf02fa3cd6841d8b065ce9fba2b31da7415aAggressive ad load: raised by 13 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 20 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:2c5397b1776b4615e61115e55bf3bf02fa3cd6841d8b065ce9fba2b31da7415aSells a randomised reward ("Limited-time Surprise Lucky Bag") and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app sells randomised rewards — crates, chests, packs, pulls — and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in its own text, so what the money buys is unknowable before paying.
Package artefact
sha256:2c5397b1776b4615e61115e55bf3bf02fa3cd6841d8b065ce9fba2b31da7415aProgress itself is for sale: "Shake your phone and get more coins"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Package artefact
sha256:2c5397b1776b4615e61115e55bf3bf02fa3cd6841d8b065ce9fba2b31da7415aThe listing says "100% Free to Play: Jump into the challenge immediately without any entry fees." with no qualification anywhere in its description, while the app's own text gates use behind payment: "Paywall intent is not provided."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
The app's own text says: "Do you really want to exit?"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:2c5397b1776b4615e61115e55bf3bf02fa3cd6841d8b065ce9fba2b31da7415a263 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Impossible to withdraw. Deceptive practices. Like many fake cash games, this app promises easy money to lure you in and show you endless ads. You will earn quick cash in the first few minutes, but near the payout target, your earnings…
all in all. it's good compared to most ., but still constantly bombarded with advertising....in the middle of trying to learn to navigate round app but waiting for adverts...may be you should let me set a server game up. 🤔
Don't bother wasting your time with even downloading this app. It advertises and promises to pay out every 3 hours. But yet it constantly kicks U our of the app. Avoid this scam/fake app at all costs!! Also I tried cashing out for $0.52…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.0.1, scanned 24 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.0.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 1.0.1, updated 2026-10-08.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
play-n-guessAssessed 2026-10-24 from 263 user reviews, the app's package and the store listing.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Five independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.