Too little checked to say Only 367 reviews read, too few to say.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 1.0.82 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.0.82, updated 2026-03-29.
This analysis describes version 1.0.84 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.0.84, updated 2026-08-14.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Pooca is a friend you can talk to and grow with.
It’s not just an AI chatbot — it’s a living space shaped by your feelings, creativity, and connections.
Feel, Create, Reflect
• Talk with AI companions who listen, remember, and evolve with you.
• Express your mood through conversations or soundscapes — your world transforms as your emotions shift.
• Discover reflections and mindful prompts that help you understand yourself better.
Build Your Emotional World
• Each feeling you share changes your digital environment — calm days bloom softly, stormy ones bring movement and sound.
• Watch your island evolve into a world that reflects who you are, moment by moment.
What makes Pooca different
• AI with a soul. Each Pooca has its own mood, tone, and story. As you chat, it grows with you, remembers moments, and responds with genuine emotion.
• A world that mirrors you.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Facts that add context without being a charge.
In-app purchases run from USD 0.99 to USD 79.99 — a 81x spread across 10 items
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The store privacy disclosure (2 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.0.82 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.0.82, updated 2026-03-29.
This analysis describes version 1.0.84 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.0.84, updated 2026-08-14.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Thanks for using Pooca! This update brings bug fixes and performance improvements.If you’d like to report an issue or request a feature, feel free to reach us at [email protected]
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
poocaAssessed 2026-10-27 from 367 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.