Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 580 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-06.

PREQUEL: Photo Editor, Filters

Prequel Inc.

Prequel is an all-in-one editor app with photo filters, video effects for Ree…

4.5 ★395,724 ratings
50M+Downloads
4+Age rating
—App size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases

About this app

Prequel is an all-in-one editor app with photo filters, video effects for Reels, and presets for your photos & videos. Be visually creative, in one tap and let followers feel your mood!

Vintage camera effects for pictures, retro photo filters and video filters, which you can use for your amazing Reels! Presets for your photos! And so many other video and photo editing tools! You will always achieve standout content with our unique app—with its fonts for text on photo, stickers, Vintage, Film, Cartoon, Grain, VHS, Anime, Y2K, and other video and photo filters and effects you can be visually creative, in one tap!

Prequel is a must-have app if you want to upgrade your photo and video editing pipeline, use more photo filters and effects, make your social media content fit a specific aesthetic, or just quickly give your casual pics and vids a more elevated look to boost your followers!…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

7 screenshots
PREQUEL: Photo Editor, Filters screenshot 1
PREQUEL: Photo Editor, Filters screenshot 2
PREQUEL: Photo Editor, Filters screenshot 3
PREQUEL: Photo Editor, Filters screenshot 4
PREQUEL: Photo Editor, Filters screenshot 5
PREQUEL: Photo Editor, Filters screenshot 6
PREQUEL: Photo Editor, Filters screenshot 7

Independent evidence report

The evidence behind this assessment

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated assessment complete

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

This analysis describes version 2.4.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 2.5.0, updated 2026-10-01.

The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 2.4.0, not the version now listed on the store.

Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:

Version 2.5.0 · 2026-10-01

No release notes were provided for this version.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Says how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
No theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 2.4.0, scanned 2026-09-23.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
3–5 requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
3 or more found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
3–9 found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

The catch list 2

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Multiple ad networks bundled
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact cfced782582e…
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 5 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: AppLovin MAX, Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), ironSource / Unity LevelPlay and 1 more
Price may differ from what you see here
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact cfced782582e…
The app ships a remote paywall-experimentation SDK, so the offer shown is configured server-side and may differ per user — including from anything we or a reviewer saw.
What we saw: Paywall is server-configured and A/B tested via Apphud — the offer shown can differ per user

Positive evidence 2

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

States a price, or offers a one-time purchase
Measuredfrom the app's own on-screen textartefact cfced782582e…
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
What we saw: Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "One-time purchase, no subscription"
Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

In the app's own text: A plan is pre-picked as 'recommended'
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the app's own on-screen text.artefact cfced782582e…
The purchase screen arrives with one plan already framed as the recommended or most popular choice, so the default is the app's preference rather than the user's. We do not compare the plans' prices, and only the app's own text evidences this, so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
What we saw: Purchase screen steers the choice: "BEST DEAL"
In the app's own text: Countdown-timer purchase pressure
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the app's own on-screen text.artefact cfced782582e…
The app's own purchase copy attaches a deadline to buying — a countdown, 'offer ends in', 'limited time' — or ships a countdown view on a purchase-screen layout.
What we saw: Deadline pressure in the app's own copy: "Limited Time Offer"

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 2.5.0.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.