LET US PRAY IN CHURCH: THE CATHOLIC APP FOR PRAYING, MEDITATING ON THE BIBLE,…
BAYARD SASome warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 56 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 7.14.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 7.14.1, updated 2026-10-15.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
LET US PRAY IN CHURCH: THE CATHOLIC APP FOR PRAYING, MEDITATING ON THE BIBLE, AND NOURISHING YOUR FAITH
Let Us Pray in Church is the first Catholic app in France, developed by a team of journalists, committed laypeople, and religious.
Let Us Pray in Church guides you on your spiritual journey, fostering a deep connection with God. Enjoy original formats, highly praised by our community, to enrich your religious practice.
Easily access all our content: podcasts, videos, music, audio Bible, Mass texts, personalized prayer, meditation, free Liturgy of the Hours…
With Let Us Pray in Church, access your content even without an internet connection.
BIBLE, PRAYER, AND MEDITATION IN ONE APP
Experience Catholic prayer in a new way: take it with you everywhere, to meditate, listen, or pray anytime, even offline.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Paywall is server-configured and A/B tested via Purchasely — the offer shown can differ per user
The app ships a remote paywall-experimentation SDK, so the offer shown is configured server-side and may differ per user — including from anything we or a reviewer saw.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:a5952cf352c5d6f1e22c7a776d745587d96bc2cc2173ee37cb8326e49266d33bSpecific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 8 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
sha256:a5952cf352c5d6f1e22c7a776d745587d96bc2cc2173ee37cb8326e49266d33bThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Go to play.google.com. Check if you’re signed in to the correct Google Account. On the left, click My subscriptions. Select the subscription you want to cancel. Click Manage and then Cancel Subscription."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:a5952cf352c5d6f1e22c7a776d745587d96bc2cc2173ee37cb8326e49266d33bThe app's own text says: "Your plan change has been validated and will be active at the end of the current subscription period on"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Package artefact
sha256:a5952cf352c5d6f1e22c7a776d745587d96bc2cc2173ee37cb8326e49266d33bThe app's own text says: "Already subscribed? Sign in."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:a5952cf352c5d6f1e22c7a776d745587d96bc2cc2173ee37cb8326e49266d33bThe app's own text says: "Downloads"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:a5952cf352c5d6f1e22c7a776d745587d96bc2cc2173ee37cb8326e49266d33bNo review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 7.14.1, scanned 30 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 7.14.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 7.14.1, updated 2026-10-15.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
prionsAssessed 2026-10-30 from 56 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.