Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 604 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 31 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.11.2 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 2.11.2, updated 2026-10-12.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Help an Innocent Prisoner Break Free! Step into the shoes of a determined prisoner in Prison Breakout, where survival is about more than just staying inside the prison walls. This unique escape game challenges you to dig your way out while balancing the harsh realities of prison life during the day. Every decision counts as you guide the innocent prisoner through this journey of freedom. Your skills, patience, and strategy will be the key to breaking free.
Experience the thrill of planning an epic escape while living the daily routines of prison life. With each day that passes, you're one step closer to completing your daring dig and reaching freedom. But beware—each night brings the risk of getting caught, and freedom won’t come easy!…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:0161e7116e1996482d98423496ce8acedf873389494bf17b07fde483ead6fd7cAggressive ad load: raised by 36 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 17 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Ships session-recording SDK (Smartlook) that can replay on-screen activity
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app ships session-recording or a wide tracking stack, holds permissions that read personal data, or is reported by users to sell, leak or over-collect it. The evidence line says which of those was observed.
Package artefact
sha256:0161e7116e1996482d98423496ce8acedf873389494bf17b07fde483ead6fd7cThe app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:0161e7116e1996482d98423496ce8acedf873389494bf17b07fde483ead6fd7c604 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
I first downloaded the fame it was awesome. but now it just spawns an ad every 30 seconds. un installing cause the amount of ads makes in not at all enjoyable or playable.
within 3 minutes I had four forced ads I like the game,but in order to play without ads I have to pay,and for the amount they ask is ridiculous.
nope. another game with many ads. uninstalled immediately
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 2.11.2, scanned 21 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.11.2 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 2.11.2, updated 2026-10-12.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Performance improvements.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
prison-break-outAssessed 2026-10-31 from 604 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.