ProCam X will turn your phone into professional camera wanna be, with full co…
Imagi MobileSome warnings 5 things we found but could not confirm. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 1.17 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.17, updated 2026-09-13.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
ProCam X will turn your phone into professional camera wanna be, with full control over exposure, focus, white balance, ISO and another features like a professional camera, which can bring your mobile photography to the next level. Take the best capture of your photo and even record your video in high resolution.
☆ ProCam X - HD Camera Pro : best camera features : ☆
✓ Control exposure (lock / adjust value)
✓ Control white balance
✓ Manual ISO *
✓ Manual focus *
✓ Manual shutter speed *
✓ Intervalometer
✓ Burst shooting mode
✓ Set custom video bit rate
✓ Realtime filter / color effect
✓ Geotagging
✓ Anti Shake
* On supported devices with camera2api enable
It's excellent fast camera features perform quickly giving your fast camera performance which is able to take many pictures at some interval in burst mode, very useful for creating stop motion or time lapse video…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Watch video Ads to unlock Full Version for 15 minutes?"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:449ae3e95a9710696bfbb40ad4a654915f13ec6e5ac9473d47501b654e74a155Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:449ae3e95a9710696bfbb40ad4a654915f13ec6e5ac9473d47501b654e74a155The app's own text says: "watch video and earn points"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Package artefact
sha256:449ae3e95a9710696bfbb40ad4a654915f13ec6e5ac9473d47501b654e74a155The app's own text says: "You are using Lite version Photo resolution limited to 10MP Video resolution limited to 1080p Video duration limited to 5 minutes Upgrade to Pro to unlock limitation"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Package artefact
sha256:449ae3e95a9710696bfbb40ad4a654915f13ec6e5ac9473d47501b654e74a155Offers a trial ("No need to pay, Install FREE version (contain Ads)") and states no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:449ae3e95a9710696bfbb40ad4a654915f13ec6e5ac9473d47501b654e74a155The app's own text says: "OK (Don't show again)"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:449ae3e95a9710696bfbb40ad4a654915f13ec6e5ac9473d47501b654e74a155Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.17, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.17 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.17, updated 2026-09-13.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
procam-xAssessed 2026-10-26 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.