Nothing published. That is not a guarantee the app is problem-free.
No specific positive published.
From our automated analysis, 15 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 5.3.6 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-15 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 5.3.6, updated 2026-09-03.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Welcome to Prookie!
With Prookie, you can take amazing photos! Experience advanced AI photo generator, including hairstyle try on, hair color changer, face shape finder, cartoon photo editor for free, and high-quality AI-generated photos. Prookie has everything you need to enhance your style effortlessly!
※Hair Style App：Awesome haircut simulator and AI hairstyles.
·hair color changer: pink, brown, gradient colors. Are you still hesitating about what color to change your hair? Come here and try it first. Multiple popular hair colors can be converted with one click to find the most suitable color for you.
·hairstyle try on: Curious about a new hair cut？long hair, short hair, curly hair, straight hair,bangs,everything is available here.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (1.2% of 500 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Trial converts to a charge: raised by 19 distinct reviewers (3.8% of 500 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The free trial demands a payment method up front and/or rolls into a paid subscription with no usable warning.
Hard to cancel: raised by 18 distinct reviewers (3.6% of 500 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Misleading advertising: raised by 25 distinct reviewers (5.0% of 500 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
Paywall blocks the basics: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (1.6% of 500 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
The store privacy disclosure (7 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
500 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Trash — It’s pretty cancerous to add an expensive subscription service while bombarding ppl with ads
Nothing but ads and bad a.I. — Does not deliver what the pictures/ description advertise . I don’t mind ads but they are extremely aggressive ads in my opinion . Shame because the ads made it seem awesome . Would gladly pay for it ,if it…
Disliked — This is literally such a scam lol it says its free but the second you open the app they bombard you with ads and you cant even use the app without paying. You download it for free but to use it you have to pay😑 like what the…
Charged without trial — The app says 3 days free trial and billed me right away
No good. — I installed it hoping it would be good like what they advertise. It’s not! It doesn’t even work on 90%of the filters, and I only had it for like 2 min. And they charged me instantly for the 20$ subscription and it was suppose…
DO NOT GET THIS APP — The cartoon effect is garbage and I was charged the full month amount for a 3 day free trial. Contacted support and after reading other reviews it sounds like they don’t get back to customers. Terrible customer…
No way to cancel the app — Did not need this app. Said you can cancel anytime and there is no place on the app to cancel it. I don’t want to be subscribed to this.
No cancel subscription button — I got the free trial and it won’t let me cancel
AVOID THIS SCAM - REQUIRES $20/mo Subscription — This is the reason I HATE mobile Apps - there is so much deception and dishonesty with the developers. You cannot see the quality of this product without a $19.99/mo subscription which you…
No way — Unsubscribed immediately. There was no “free to use” option. Complete false advertising. I want a refund.
TOTAL LIE 🤣😂🤣😂🤣 — First, you have to subscribe just to see if it works. Second, FALSE advertising! 😂🤣 There is no possible way the advertised cartoon results are real. I used a plain, clear photo, which produced reults ABSOLUTELY…
False advertisement — Misleading click bait.
There's too much interruptions — I legit open the app and get greeted by an ad And also you have to pay for almost everything
Cartoon Editor — Said it was free then I was charged 19.99 when I tried to do a photo
Money grabbing scam app — I feel like any of these cool hip apps that work magically are usually scams. And I am right about this one. The moment u get into the app, it throws all kinds of subscription at you. You literally can’t do…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 5.3.6 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-15 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 5.3.6, updated 2026-09-03.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
"※Find your face shape: AI Face Shape Test: Are you still worried about your daily outfit and hair style? Let’s use Prookie's AI styling assistant to deeply analyze your face shape and facial features, generate a 100% exclusive high-level styling plan for you! ※Awesome cartoon effects: ·Art effects: cartoon, oil painting, sketch, etc., instantly turn photos into works of art. ※Awesome hairstyle: ·Hairstyle: curly hair, wavy hair, straight hair, braided hair, everything is available here, no need to go to the barber shop, just one click, you can see the effect immediately ※Multiple trendy hair colors: ·Hair color: pink, brown, gradient color, are you still hesitating about what…
Shortened here; the full notes are on the store listing.
Appworthy
prookie-apple-1494448939Assessed 2026-10-15 from 500 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.