Some warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 402 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 23.3.3 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 23.3.3, updated 2026-08-31.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Step into the world of Puzzle & Dragons, an addictive, FREE match-3 puzzle game with classic monster-collecting RPG fun!
- INTUITIVE AND ENGAGING
Assemble a powerful team of monsters and take on fierce foes in the depths of thrilling dungeons! Attacking is simple--just match 3 orbs of the same color to trigger an attack from the corresponding monster on your team. Chain multiple combos and colors to increase your damage and unleash devastating attacks from other monsters in your team!
- ENDLESS MONSTER COMBINATIONS, LIMITLESS POWER
With over 10,000 unique monsters to collect—from the cutest to the fiercest—the possibilities for team combinations are simply endless! Monsters can synergize with each other to enhance each other's abilities and make your teams more effective in battle. Build the team that suits your playstyle!
- RECIPES FOR EVOLUTION…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 3 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), Meta Audience Network, Unity Ads
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:ef2299581362641c9e76cc3308a99219e01dbd3dbf9ca59ec96c6a0e0be0b0d2Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a randomised reward ("Your Stamina is full! Play now!") and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app sells randomised rewards — crates, chests, packs, pulls — and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in its own text, so what the money buys is unknowable before paying.
Package artefact
sha256:ef2299581362641c9e76cc3308a99219e01dbd3dbf9ca59ec96c6a0e0be0b0d2The app's own text says: "No thanks"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:ef2299581362641c9e76cc3308a99219e01dbd3dbf9ca59ec96c6a0e0be0b0d2No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 23.3.3, scanned 20 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 23.3.3 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 23.3.3, updated 2026-08-31.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Ver. 23.4.0 Update Details * Battle speed is quicker. Rapid Mode has also been added. * New Awoken Skills have been added (Extreme Enhanced Combos, etc.). * Select Awoken Skills and Latent Awoken Skills have received adjustments. * A Random option has been added to the Dungeon BGM selection menu. * Miscellaneous bug fixes and minor improvements have been made. *For details, see [Others > Links > Official Site] from within the app.
No release notes were provided for this version.
puzzle-and-dragons-englishAssessed 2026-10-30 from 402 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.