Step into the enchanting world of "Pyramid Mahjong," a captivating match-3 pu…
UniRise StudioSerious warnings 2 confirmed warnings, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code and the store listing.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.6.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.6.1, updated 2026-10-23.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Step into the enchanting world of "Pyramid Mahjong," a captivating match-3 puzzle game that blends the allure of ancient Egypt with thrilling gameplay! In this immersive adventure, you'll embark on a quest to uncover hidden treasures and unravel the mysteries of the Pharaohs.
As you match and eliminate vibrant tiles adorned with intricate hieroglyphics, scarabs, and symbols of Egyptian mythology, you'll experience stunning visuals that bring the majestic pyramids and the ancient landscape to life. Each level presents unique challenges that require strategic thinking and quick reflexes to conquer.
Unlock powerful bonuses and special tiles as you progress, enhancing your gameplay and helping you achieve high scores. With hundreds of levels filled with engaging puzzles, "Pyramid Mahjong" offers endless hours of entertainment for players of all ages.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:a1932b71fb00f1f0e74f3351a67de1143ccf44308630c35d8081899147c0b475Aggressive ad load: raised by 11 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 36 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Misleading advertising: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 80 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
The app's own text says: "Please press "Continue" if you choose to start using our app."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:a1932b71fb00f1f0e74f3351a67de1143ccf44308630c35d8081899147c0b475The app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:a1932b71fb00f1f0e74f3351a67de1143ccf44308630c35d8081899147c0b475400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
no ads on first 12 screens then bombarded with ads after that you fricken lied going byby
I downloaded this game from the ad, as it clearly stated it was ad-free. Yet, I am getting ads now after every level. Please be honest in your description of this game and don't mislead people into downloading it by saying it is ad-free…
Great game so far. l'm only on the 8th set of tiles. To good to be true the ads are annoying, way too many.
no ads on first 12 screens then bombarded with ads after that you fricken lied going byby
This was advertised as no ads but after level 10 the ads start after every level. It also starts completing the game for you with combos which I hate as I prefer to work it out for myself. There doesn't seem to be any way to switch this…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 3.6.1, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.6.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.6.1, updated 2026-10-23.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
pyramid-mahjongAssessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews, the app's package and the store listing.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Five independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.