Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.

Real Guitar - Music Band Game

🎸 Ever wanted to play guitar simply?

Gismart
Multiple ad networks — Code from multiple ad networksAggressive ads — Aggressive ad loadDeletion (dev says) — Developer says you can request data deletion
Google Play rating3.1★683.2K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app purchases
Age4+Store age rating
CategoryGames
DeveloperGismart

At a glance

Full report

From our automated analysis, 18 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 3.40.4 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-18 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 3.41, updated 2025-10-28.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

🎸 Ever wanted to play guitar simply? Got no time to hire a backing band? But still, want to be an electric guitar-playing hero? This is the perfect music game to get started. Real Guitar is the ultimate guitar skills simulator. And it’s packed with features including electric and acoustic sounds – recorded with live instruments – to deliver realistic experience!

Dive in and learn how to play simply with the guitar chords and tabs. The app has dozens of options and playing modes to try out – a perfect fit for both beginners and guitar games masters! Never get bored!

As a temporary musical instrument substitute or a great way to revise chords – there is no better guitar app out there! Want to jam to the latest hits? Need the tabs for the most popular songs? Or just spending some free time relaxing with a few bars of a rock hit? All you need is right here.…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

3 published · 1 shown, not confirmed

Things to watch for 2

Findings that met the published evidence standard.

Multiple ad networks bundled

Measured

Bundles 10 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager) and 6 more

Sources
SDKs in the app package
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package
Definition

The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.

Package artefact

sha256:a503cc267a9107c603df6e981797caaadc031a92fbe94a34e3d0793581130fc5

Aggressive ad load

2 independent sources agree

Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Watch a video to earn a reward!"

Sources
User reviews and the app's own on-screen text
Agreement
2 independent kinds of source agree.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package. From Google Play reviews
Definition

Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.

Package artefact

sha256:a503cc267a9107c603df6e981797caaadc031a92fbe94a34e3d0793581130fc5

Positives 1

Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.

Developer says data deletion can be requested

Measured

The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

Sources
The store listing
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
From the Google Play listing
Definition

The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.

Open evidence

One source only — shown, not confirmed 1

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Trial terms not stated in the app's own text

One source only

Offers a free trial ("Free Trial Enabled") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.

Package artefact

sha256:a503cc267a9107c603df6e981797caaadc031a92fbe94a34e3d0793581130fc5

What reviewers report

514 reviews read · 1 review-based observation

514 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Aggressive ad load

Published finding

NYC but too many ads

4★ · Google Play · 2026-09-29

can't even play 1 second without getting a ad or premium suggestion

1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-20

I can't even play I'm Stuck with the premium ad

1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-18

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

8 measured · 0 not assessed

Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
Under 65% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

Android package 3.40.4, scanned 1 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.

Sensitive permissions
None requested
Counted against a fixed list of eighteen sensitive Android permissions: sixteen runtime permissions, among them location, camera, microphone, contacts and SMS, and two the user must switch on in system settings, drawing over other apps and usage access. Requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
3 or more found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 18 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 3.40.4 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-18 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 3.41, updated 2025-10-28.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

Google Play

Version 3.41 · 2025-10-28

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
real-guitar-google-com-gismart-guitar
Assessment date
18 Oct 2026
Sources used
6 independent signals: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
514
Package examined
Android · 3.40.4 · scanned 1 Oct 2026
Measurement vocabulary
1.4
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-18 from 514 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-18 Version analyzed: 3.40.46 independent signals514 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure.

Store facts

Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

Google Play

Store rating
3.14 ★ · 683,222 ratings
Version
3.41
Updated
28 Oct 2025
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
4+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
Gismart
Category
Games
Listing price
Free · In-app purchases

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices, so this list covers the other store only.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.