Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.9.10 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 2.9.15, updated 2026-10-13.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Small actions everyday create life changing behaviors. Our mental health tracker and self care journal helps you with goal setting and achieving personal growth! Remente acts as your life coach and provides a bunch of self help tools to feel better and glow up and achieve self improvement, healthy habits and well being.
Start now with developing healthy habits to improve your self control and live a healthy lifestyle with greater self love, more self help and less stress, anxiety and depression!
Daily Remente
A daily video session with a life coach explaining different concepts of daily self care and interactive guides for users to learn about and practice mental health and well being.
Goal Setting Guide
Create good life goals to achieve personal growth and development.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Paywall is server-configured and A/B tested via Adapty — the offer shown can differ per user
The app ships a remote paywall-experimentation SDK, so the offer shown is configured server-side and may differ per user — including from anything we or a reviewer saw.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:6de76a8cf16c977905924699118b4afe946f45ee18ab999e68a675d365b31032Paywall blocks the basics: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 50 reviews we read)
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 8 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
sha256:6de76a8cf16c977905924699118b4afe946f45ee18ab999e68a675d365b31032The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Instructions on how to cancel your Remente Premium subscription."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:6de76a8cf16c977905924699118b4afe946f45ee18ab999e68a675d365b31032Offers a free trial ("Try Free & Subscribe") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:6de76a8cf16c977905924699118b4afe946f45ee18ab999e68a675d365b31032Deadline pressure in the app's own copy: "Offer expires in"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own purchase copy attaches a deadline to buying — a countdown, 'offer ends in', 'limited time' — or ships a countdown view on a purchase-screen layout.
Package artefact
sha256:6de76a8cf16c977905924699118b4afe946f45ee18ab999e68a675d365b31032The app's own text says: "Already have an account?"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:6de76a8cf16c977905924699118b4afe946f45ee18ab999e68a675d365b31032The app's own text says: "Removing downloads"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:6de76a8cf16c977905924699118b4afe946f45ee18ab999e68a675d365b31032400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
(EDIT) it's 100 bucks a year now?? 😂 WITH a discount, otherwise it's 200 bucks?? Are you all tripping? The concept is great but I do not understand why being able to check items off from the previous day is a function locked behind a…
I love the app so far except one BIG thing! Access to my own personal data! Once I logged things, everything that is in the past is locked behind a paywall! I understand locking the future days behind a paywall but it shouldn't be the…
the free version is very limited. you don't get a lot out of the app unless you pay. For example you can't track your goals or progress over tim, because the free version only ever shows you the current week. The mood check in questions…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 2.9.10, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.9.10 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 2.9.15, updated 2026-10-13.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
rementeAssessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.