Retro Racing

Touch-first steering that finally gets mobile racing right!

Raketspel
Google Play rating4.4★2.3K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app purchases
Age4+Store age rating
CategoryGames
DeveloperRaketspel

What we found

Full report

Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 121 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.

Money

Ads

From our automated analysis, 24 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 1.10.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .

The store currently lists version 1.10.0, updated 2026-08-27.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Touch-first steering that finally gets mobile racing right!

Take the wheel of classic retro cars and race through beautifully crafted tracks with controls built from the ground up to be easily played one handed. Smooth, precise, and satisfying from the very first turn.

Focused on the joy of driving.

Features:

• One-Handed Play. Designed for portrait mode so you can race with one hand — on the bus, in bed, wherever. No need to flip your phone sideways.

• Built for Touch. Steering designed specifically for mobile, delivering precise, intuitive control that makes every corner feel right.

• Classic Cars with Character. Charming, old-school cars inspired by real classics — each with its own weight, handling, and personality.

• A Driving Feel You'll Love. Carefully tuned physics make every drift smooth, every race immersive, and every lap worth one more try.

• Pick Up & Play.…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

2 published · 6 shown, not confirmed

Things to watch for 2

Findings that met the published evidence standard.

Multiple ad networks bundled

Measured

Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more

Sources
SDKs in the app package
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package
Definition

The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:1541576e4b92f456f493bc857ea7e70a76fa2c468c6f9e48f0e25d77e5502f56

Aggressive ad load

2 independent sources agree

Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Button label to watch an ad for one more free try at the event level"

Sources
User reviews and the app's own on-screen text
Agreement
2 independent kinds of source agree.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package. From Google Play reviews
Definition

Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:1541576e4b92f456f493bc857ea7e70a76fa2c468c6f9e48f0e25d77e5502f56

One source only — shown, not confirmed 6

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Progress pauses until you wait or pay

One source only

Use is rationed by a refillable meter: "OUT OF LIVES!"

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Use is rationed by an energy/hearts/lives meter that runs out and forces a wait or a purchase.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:1541576e4b92f456f493bc857ea7e70a76fa2c468c6f9e48f0e25d77e5502f56

Hard to cancel

One source only

Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:1541576e4b92f456f493bc857ea7e70a76fa2c468c6f9e48f0e25d77e5502f56

Pay to progress

One source only

Progress itself is for sale: "Need more coins"

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:1541576e4b92f456f493bc857ea7e70a76fa2c468c6f9e48f0e25d77e5502f56

Developer says data deletion can be requested

One source only

The app's own text says: "Delete All"

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:1541576e4b92f456f493bc857ea7e70a76fa2c468c6f9e48f0e25d77e5502f56

Usable without an account

One source only

The app's own text says: "Please press "Continue" if you choose to start using our app."

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:1541576e4b92f456f493bc857ea7e70a76fa2c468c6f9e48f0e25d77e5502f56

Works offline

One source only

The app's own text says: "Thanks for your interest. We will share more once you're back online."

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:1541576e4b92f456f493bc857ea7e70a76fa2c468c6f9e48f0e25d77e5502f56

What reviewers report

121 reviews read · 1 review-based observation

121 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Aggressive ad load

Published finding

I've deleted way to many games I like because there's way to many ads

1★ · Google Play · 2026-05-23

too many ads

1★ · Google Play · 2026-05-09

fun little game. simplistic but rewarding drift racing on short tracks. But lots and lots of ads. can pay to remove ads.. but I stubbornly refused. 😁

3★ · Google Play · 2026-06-12

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

8 measured · 0 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

Android package 1.10.0, scanned 24 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.

Sensitive permissions
None requested
Counted against a fixed list of eighteen sensitive Android permissions: sixteen runtime permissions, among them location, camera, microphone, contacts and SMS, and two the user must switch on in system settings, drawing over other apps and usage access. Requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 24 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 1.10.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .

The store currently lists version 1.10.0, updated 2026-08-27.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

Google Play

Version 1.10.0 · 2026-08-27

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
retro-racing-google-se-raketspel-retroracing
Assessment date
24 Oct 2026
Sources used
6 independent signals: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
121
Package examined
Android · 1.10.0 · scanned 24 Oct 2026
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-24 from 121 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.

How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-24 Version analyzed: 1.10.06 independent signals121 reviews scannedConfidence: MediumNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure.

Store facts

Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

Google Play

Store rating
4.41 ★ · 2,301 ratings
Version
1.10.0
Updated
27 Aug 2026
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
4+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
Raketspel
Category
Games
Listing price
Free · In-app purchases

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.