Appworthy

Rogue Racing: PinkSlip

Best Racing Game Ever

babaroga, llc.
Download on theApp StoreGet it onGoogle Play
App Store rating4.6★126 ratings
Google Play rating4.4★444 ratings
PriceFreeIn-app $1.99–$19.99
Age4+Store age rating
Size359 MBiPhone download
CategoryGames
Developerbabaroga, llc.

What we found

Full report

Too little checked to say Only 97 reviews read, too few to say.

Money

From our automated analysis, 31 Oct 2026.

This analysis describes version 2.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .

The store currently lists version 2.0, updated 2024-03-15.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Street Racing. Custom Cars. Rogue Attitude

Get ready for a 100% personalized mobile racing experience! Create the ultimate, custom racing rig with over 50 different aftermarket parts and style options.Competie in pulse-pounding, winner-take-all events on gritty, inner-city streets.

RACE FOR "PINK SLIPS"

Race your friends, and if you win, own their cars. Smash them, sell them, keep them. They lose and you win. This is how it it is done in style.

AWESOME 3D GRAPHICS

Rogue Racing pushes the limits of mobile hardware with incredibly detailed car models, high frame rates, and dense racing environments. Graphics are optimized for the latest iPhone and iPad devices.

INTENSE, DYNAMIC GAMEPLAY

Compete against cutthroat AI racers that dynamically match your skills in exciting game modes including: Street, Time-Attack, and Elimination.…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

0 published · 2 shown, not confirmed

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Usable without an account

One source only

The app's own text says: "Continue as %1$s"

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:b6b7c74ae63a26e40a9878cc8e3075a8da8ac83152b5fb7037a7f5e2a86c0330

Works offline

One source only

The app's own text says: "Download failed"

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:b6b7c74ae63a26e40a9878cc8e3075a8da8ac83152b5fb7037a7f5e2a86c0330

Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.

What reviewers report

97 reviews read · 0 review-based observations

No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.

Measurements

8 measured · 0 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
No theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

Android package 2.0, scanned 25 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.

Sensitive permissions
1–2 requested
Counted against a fixed list of eighteen sensitive Android permissions: sixteen runtime permissions, among them location, camera, microphone, contacts and SMS, and two the user must switch on in system settings, drawing over other apps and usage access. Requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 31 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 2.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .

The store currently lists version 2.0, updated 2024-03-15.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

App Store

Version 2.7.2360 · 2024-04-04
* Various backend updates

Google Play

Version 2.0 · 2024-03-15

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
rogue-racing
Assessment date
31 Oct 2026
Sources used
4 independent signals: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest
Reviews read
97
Package examined
Android · 2.0 · scanned 25 Oct 2026
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-31 from 97 user reviews and the app's package.

How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-31 Version analyzed: 2.04 independent signals97 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.14Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest. Not yet checked: the store listing and the store privacy disclosure.

Store facts

App Store · Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

App Store

Store rating
4.56 ★ · 126 ratings
Version
2.7.2360
Updated
4 Apr 2024
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
4+
Size
359 MB
Open in App Store

Google Play

Store rating
4.36 ★ · 444 ratings
Version
2.0
Updated
15 Mar 2024
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
4+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
babaroga, llc.
Category
Games
Listing price
Free · In-app purchases

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells

From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.

Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices. The list below covers the other store only.
One-off packs9
110 KeysPack$1.99
100,000 CoinsPack$1.99
110 KeysPack$4.99
640 KeysPack$19.99
450 KeysPack$6.99
260 KeysPack$9.99
1000 KeysPack$12.99
400,000 CoinsPack$6.99
1,000,000 CoinsPack$12.99

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.
Review thresholds Read the methodology For developers

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.

Report a factual error — free Email a correction