Root: Community Chat & Voice

Text chat, video calls & apps

Root Communications, Inc
App Store rating4.3★142 ratings
Google Play rating3.4★795 ratings
PriceFreeListed price
Age17+ · 12+App Store · Google Play
Size173 MBiPhone download
CategorySocial

What we found

Full report

Some warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 371 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.

Money

  • Free to download.

Paywalls and prices

Positives

From our automated analysis, 31 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 0.9.39 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .

The store currently lists version 0.9.39, updated 2026-10-14.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Root is community chat with voice and video calls, screen share, themes, and apps, all in one place. Chat in channels, hop into a call with your group, and add apps to enhance your community experience.

FREE PROFILE AND THEME CUSTOMIZATION

No paywalls on personality. Animated profile pictures, animated banners, custom emoji and themes are all free. Pick a theme or build your own.

VOICE, VIDEO AND SCREEN SHARE

Talk in voice channels, turn on video, and share your screen with sound. Move a call from your computer to your phone without hanging up.

APPS IN YOUR COMMUNITY

Add apps to your community. Draw together on one canvas, track tasks, or plan your next raid.

BRING YOUR SERVER

Import a server template and Root sets up your channels, categories and roles.

FIND YOUR PEOPLE

Browse Community Discovery to find a new group chat, or list your own community.

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

3 published · 1 shown, not confirmed

Things to watch for 1

Findings that met the published evidence standard.

Paywall blocks the basics

2 independent sources agree

The listing says "No paywalls on personality." with no qualification anywhere in its description, while the app's own text gates use behind payment: "Paywall intent is not provided."

Sources
The app's own on-screen text and the store listing
Agreement
2 independent kinds of source agree.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package. From the Google Play listing
Definition

The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.

Open evidence

Positives 2

Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.

Developer says data deletion can be requested

Measured

The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

Sources
The store listing
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
From the Google Play listing
Definition

The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.

Open evidence

No advertising SDKs

Measured

No advertising or mediation SDK among the 1 SDK detected in the package

Sources
SDKs in the app package
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package
Definition

No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:1b067ef36c96ab5e593dc1c0c222b745e27184afd3bc2ecaab0792858a99e81a

One source only — shown, not confirmed 1

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Hard to cancel

One source only

Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:1b067ef36c96ab5e593dc1c0c222b745e27184afd3bc2ecaab0792858a99e81a

What reviewers report

371 reviews read · 0 review-based observations

No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.

Measurements

8 measured · 0 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
No theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
Under 65% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

Android package 0.9.39, scanned 31 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.

Sensitive permissions
3–5 requested
Counted against a fixed list of eighteen sensitive Android permissions: sixteen runtime permissions, among them location, camera, microphone, contacts and SMS, and two the user must switch on in system settings, drawing over other apps and usage access. Requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
None found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
None found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 31 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 0.9.39 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .

The store currently lists version 0.9.39, updated 2026-10-14.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

App Store

Version 0.9.40 · 2026-10-26
This update brings Picture-in-Picture and new layouts to calls, and fixes a crash when saving custom themes. - Calls keep playing in Picture-in-Picture when you leave the app. - New call layouts for two people, screen shares and groups. - Swipe the call screen down to shrink it into the floating call window. - Pick profile pictures and banners from Files. - Liquid Glass (experimental) on iOS 26 and later. Turn it on in Settings > General. Will always be an opt-in setting. - Root is now better suited for tablets, as well as the upcoming iPhone Duo. - Add several emoji at once by turning it on in Settings > Chat. - Deafening now mutes you too. - Picking an online status now reflects the…

Shortened here; the full notes are on the store listing.

Google Play

Version 0.9.39 · 2026-10-14

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
root-apple-6742028281
Assessment date
31 Oct 2026
Sources used
6 independent signals: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
371
Package examined
Android · 0.9.39 · scanned 31 Oct 2026
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-31 from 371 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.

How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-31 Version analyzed: 0.9.396 independent signals371 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.14Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure.

Store facts

App Store · Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

App Store

Store rating
4.26 ★ · 142 ratings
Version
0.9.40
Updated
26 Oct 2026
Price
Free
Age rating
17+
Size
173 MB
Open in App Store

Google Play

Store rating
3.43 ★ · 795 ratings
Version
0.9.39
Updated
14 Oct 2026
Price
Free
Age rating
12+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
Root Communications, Inc
Category
Social
Listing price
Free

No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.