Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.

Rush Royale: Tower Defense RPG

PvP Card battle・Merge Strategy

MYGAMES MENA FZ LLC
Pay to progress — Reported by users: Pay to progress
App Store rating4.5★95.9K ratings
PriceFreeListed price
Age12+Store age rating
Size1,021 MBiPhone download
CategoryGames

At a glance

Full report

From our automated analysis, 8 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 38.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-08 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 38.0, updated 2026-09-30.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Welcome to the Isle of Rhandum - a realm of tower defense, clans, magic and mayhem! Collect units, assemble a deck for base defense and get ready to meet one of the mobile legends and the most unique TD games - Rush Royale!

Mighty warriors are ready for a TD clash! You have plenty of cute but fearsome units at your disposal, from keen-eyed Archers and crafty Trappers to angry Bruisers and graceful Blade Dancers! Merge units and manage your mana carefully - devise a strategy around your deck’s strengths in a castle defense! And don’t forget about Heroes - these mighty champions have the most powerful abilities!…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

1 published · 2 shown, not confirmed

Things to watch for 1

Findings that met the published evidence standard.

Pay to progress

Reported by 66 users

Pay to progress: raised by 66 distinct reviewers (12.8% of 516 reviews scanned)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
User reports only. Published because the review evidence cleared this label’s own reviewer threshold.
Where measured
From App Store reviews
Reported by
Raised by 66 distinct reviewers — 12.8% of the 516 reviews scanned on this store leg (App Store).
Published threshold
28 reviewers and 2.20% of at least 500 reviews
Definition

Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.

Open evidence

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app

One source only

Misleading advertising: raised by 11 distinct reviewers (2.1% of 516 reviews scanned)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From App Store reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.

Open evidence

Usable without an account

One source only

The store privacy disclosure (7 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.

Sources
The store privacy disclosure
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From the App Store privacy disclosure

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.

Open evidence

What reviewers report

516 reviews read · 2 review-based observations

516 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Pay to progress

Published finding

Raised by 66 distinct reviewers — 12.8% of the 516 reviews scanned on this store leg (App Store).

A little p2w-ish, but great overall!! — As the title says, you kinda gotta spend a little to actually make any solid progression (so, like, 3$ for experiment tokens) but if you’re fine with some grinding then that should be the only…

4★ · App Store · 2026-10-11

Pay to win to the max — Fun game, but unless your looking to spend $200-300 dollars just to have a chance at competing, this isn’t your game. You have to pay just to be a contender. Worst part is it’s all WAY overpriced.

2★ · App Store · 2026-10-08

Too much chance and not balanced — It is entertaining but it depends on too much chance and it’s not balanced and it’s hard to improve your deck without paying money , and it’s kind of pay to win game

3★ · App Store · 2026-10-02

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app

Shown, not confirmed

False Advertising — This game falsely tells you it has multiple features that are never shown, not to mention they completely copied clash royales system this game is actual trash.

1★ · App Store · 2026-08-07

Nothing like the ads or the App store video — In the game you build a deck of 5 cards and you spawn in a random card using mana ( recourse you get from killing ) you can only merge 2 of the same card and it gives bonus damage or attack…

2★ · App Store · 2026-07-24

Add be lying 😭 — Nothing like the adds but a solid game

4★ · App Store · 2026-07-23

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

5 measured · 3 not assessed

Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.

Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app

Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 8 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 38.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-08 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 38.0, updated 2026-09-30.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

App Store

Version 38.0 · 2026-09-30
Update 38.0 is here: World Bosses: a new clan PvE event with unique rewards – the Banners, a new source power for your heroes. The Festival of Talents: meet Archmage, the new legendary unit! Access to artifacts: additional slots unlocked for the PvP battles you play. Masters’ Tournament: event’s decks updated! Cosmetics: a new chest with 400+ emoji and avatars Other changes: added Reincarnations of Level 4 and 5 See you on the Isle of Rhandum!

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
rush-royale-apple-1526121033
Assessment date
8 Oct 2026
Sources used
3 independent signals: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
516
Package examined
No package scan
Measurement vocabulary
1.4
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-08 from 516 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-08 Version analyzed: 38.03 independent signals516 reviews scannedConfidence: LowNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.

Store facts

App Store

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

App Store

Store rating
4.52 ★ · 95,867 ratings
Version
38.0
Updated
30 Sep 2026
Price
Free
Age rating
12+
Size
1,021 MB
Open in App Store
Developer
MYGAMES MENA FZ LLC
Category
Games
Listing price
Free

No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.