Vinyl Identifier is your ultimate record scanner and vinyl companion.
Brite Technologies LLCSome warnings 5 users report trouble cancelling. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 141 reviews.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.85 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.85, updated 2026-09-01.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Vinyl Identifier is your ultimate record scanner and vinyl companion. Instantly identify any record by scanning its cover, barcode, or catalog number, and discover its true market value. Whether you’re a collector, reseller, or just found a box of old LPs, Vinyl Identifier helps you know exactly what you have in your hands.
Main Features & Benefits
Record Scanner – Instantly identify vinyl by scanning cover art, barcode, or catalog number.
Vinyl Identifier – Get full release details: artist, tracklist, year, and pressing info.
Record Value Checker – See real-time market value to know if your LP is a $5 find or a $500 treasure.
Collection Manager – Build and organize your personal vinyl library in the cloud.
Wishlist – Save records you want to track down later.
Export & Backup – Export your collection to CSV or sync across devices.
Discogs Integration – Close integration with the world’s…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Hard to cancel: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 28 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
141 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
terrible experience. no instructions. cannot cancel subscription.
they offer a free trial but you can't try unless you pay and then you can't cancel. seems like a rip off
They make it impossible to cancel. avoid.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.85 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.85, updated 2026-09-01.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
scan-and-value-recordAssessed 2026-10-27 from 141 user reviews. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. One independent signal is read — user reviews — and each candidate finding is filed under the source that supports it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.