Sci-Fi Futuristic Watch Faces

Explore tomorrow on your wrist with Sci-Fi Futuristic Watch Faces!

Systorso Inc.
Google Play rating4.2★617 ratings
PriceFreeIn-app purchases
Age4+Store age rating
CategoryLifestyle
DeveloperSystorso Inc.

What we found

Full report

Some warnings 7 users report an aggressive ad load; 2 things we found but could not confirm. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 51 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.

Money

Ads

From our automated analysis, 25 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 31.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .

The store lists the version as varying by device, updated 2026-09-11.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Explore tomorrow on your wrist with Sci-Fi Futuristic Watch Faces!

This futuristic watchfaces app gives advanced science fiction and mysterious attraction watchfaces for the Wear OS 6 and above watches. To access the complete watch face collection, install both the mobile and Wear OS apps. Initially, one watch face is available directly on your watch without requiring the mobile app.

The Sci-Fi Futuristic Watch Faces app includes both analog and digital watch faces. You can pick the desired sci-fi dial and apply it to the watch screen.

The app also offers advanced customizable shortcuts and complications, available exclusively for Premium users.

You can personalize the watch face with customizable shortcuts that provide quick access to useful functions directly from the watch display, including

• Alarm

• Battery

• Calendar

• Settings

• Other supported actions…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

0 published · 3 shown, not confirmed

One source only — shown, not confirmed 3

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Aggressive ad load

One source only

Aggressive ad load: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 7 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From Google Play reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
13.7% of the 51 reviews read.

Hard to cancel

One source only

Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:5e7d3a84d585c4210991219ca8d005a3b7f6bab8d21a42c7e06ceb81e8ad742f

Trial terms not stated in the app's own text

One source only

Offers a trial ("Hurry! Let's explore Sci-Fi Futuristic Watch Faces") and states no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text

Sources
The app's own on-screen text
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
Found in the Android app’s package

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.

How we know

Package artefact

sha256:5e7d3a84d585c4210991219ca8d005a3b7f6bab8d21a42c7e06ceb81e8ad742f

Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.

What reviewers report

51 reviews read · 1 review-based observation

51 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Aggressive ad load

Shown, not confirmed

I paid for the app, and I am still getting bombarded with ads, and also can't add complications or shortcuts to the homescreen. It will remain a one-star until I get a refund.

1★ · Google Play · 2023-11-21

You pay for the app and you get spammed by ads. Watch faces not worth the money. The ads just turn you off. Refund requested.

1★ · Google Play · 2023-11-24

the themes are awesome looking and even in the free version of the app, those are cool looking. only complaint I have is that even though I paid for the premium I still get the forced ads. only reason I gave this a 4 star and not a 5…

4★ · Google Play · 2024-09-10

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

8 measured · 0 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

Android package 31.0, scanned 25 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.

Sensitive permissions
1–2 requested
Counted against a fixed list of eighteen sensitive Android permissions: sixteen runtime permissions, among them location, camera, microphone, contacts and SMS, and two the user must switch on in system settings, drawing over other apps and usage access. Requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 25 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 31.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .

The store lists the version as varying by device, updated 2026-09-11.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

Google Play

Version varies by device · 2026-09-11

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
sci-fi-futuristic-watch-faces
Assessment date
25 Oct 2026
Sources used
6 independent signals: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
51
Package examined
Android · 31.0 · scanned 25 Oct 2026
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-25 from 51 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.

How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-25 Version analyzed: 31.06 independent signals51 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure.

Store facts

Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

Google Play

Store rating
4.23 ★ · 617 ratings
Version
Varies by device
Updated
11 Sep 2026
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
4+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
Systorso Inc.
Category
Lifestyle
Listing price
Free · In-app purchases

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.