Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 622 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-04.

Scoopz: Real Life, Real Videos

Local AI, Inc.

Your people.

4.6 ★114,918 ratings
10M+Downloads
17+Age rating
—App size
FreeIn-app purchases

About this app

Your people. Your videos.

Scoopz is the short-video app where your feed is built from communities you choose — so every video feels like it belongs.

Join Circles (video communities) around your passions, your place, and real life.

Whether it’s authentic moments or content about what you care most about, Scoopz keeps your feed relevant and meaningful.

Why Scoopz feels different: - Communities, not chaos: Follow Circles to keep your feed focused on what you love. - Real stays hero: Authentic, unfiltered stories are still our most celebrated videos. - The right audience: Post directly into your Circle so the right people see it first. - Easy creation: No studio, no script — just open your phone and share.…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

5 screenshots
Scoopz: Real Life, Real Videos screenshot 1
Scoopz: Real Life, Real Videos screenshot 2
Scoopz: Real Life, Real Videos screenshot 3
Scoopz: Real Life, Real Videos screenshot 4
Scoopz: Real Life, Real Videos screenshot 5

Independent evidence report

The evidence behind this assessment

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated assessment complete

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

This analysis describes version 3.38.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 3.38.0, updated 2026-09-21.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 3.38.0, scanned 2026-10-01.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
6 or more requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
3 or more found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

The catch list 1

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Multiple ad networks bundled
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact 2a2d4263a05d…
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more

Context 1

Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.

Asks for more sensitive permissions than similar apps
MeasuredPublished as context — deliberately not a charge · from the app manifestartefact 2a2d4263a05d…
The package requests substantially more of the device's sensitive permissions than the typical app in its category. This is a measurement, not an accusation: a permission is granted because a feature needs it, and a wide request list is a reason to look rather than a finding on its own.
What we saw: Requests 7 sensitive permissions (ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION, ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION, CAMERA, READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE, READ_MEDIA_IMAGES, READ_PHONE_STATE, RECORD_AUDIO); the median for 72 scanned apps in Entertainment is 2

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Aggressive ad load: raised by 10 distinct reviewers (1.6% of 622 reviews scanned)
In the app's own text: Tracking and data collection concerns
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is SDKs in the app package.artefact 2a2d4263a05d…
The app ships session-recording or a wide tracking stack, holds permissions that read personal data, or is reported by users to sell, leak or over-collect it. The evidence line says which of those was observed.
What we saw: Ships session-recording SDK (Instabug) that can replay on-screen activity

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Aggressive ad load
“The app is entirely to buggy and the ads are completely ridiculous its literally every other video, its not worth downloading you can find way better entertainment then ts.”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-20
Aggressive ad load
“yeah it was cool until you showed me the same ad every two videos 50 times in a row.. not to mention you're pausing videos to play the sound of the add over them..”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-06
Aggressive ad load
“at first no ads played after a couple days the ads started appearing every 3 videos. most are tired of the ad bs. ads shouldn't be forced that frequently, do better scoopz.”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-28

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 3.38.0.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Business modelFree

Prices and terms as disclosed by the store listing.