Some warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 380 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 0.39b Alpha of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 0.39b Alpha, updated 2025-11-02.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Welcome to SCP complex!
Scary but interesting monsters, people, objects are waiting for you in this game.
Reconstructed containment chambers with their strangest occupants, taken from SCP Foundation Wiki
The game is based on secret documents from the SCP Foundation.
SCP (Secure, Contain, Protect) - contains information about objects, creatures, locations and events.
The application has 4 localizations:
• English (SCF EN Foundation)
• Russian (SCP Foundation RU)
• Italian (Online translation)
• Arabic (Online translation)
The game has:
- SCPs in their containment cells
- SCP has its own behavior taken from the SCP Wiki source
- Buttons for experiments in containment chambers
- Atmospheric GUI taken straight from SCP games
- The game does not require internet…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 3 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), Unity Ads, Yandex Mobile Ads
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:fe7bd4d0fc0ab1c39ad3908d27a93c457395aeb9b44c927f6ad987ca6a9fb2deSpecific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 76 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Ships a purchase screen ("Paywall intent is not provided.") with no dismiss, skip or "continue free" text anywhere in the package
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
A paywall screen ships with no dismiss, skip or 'maybe later' affordance anywhere in the package, so the app's own text offers no way in without paying.
Package artefact
sha256:fe7bd4d0fc0ab1c39ad3908d27a93c457395aeb9b44c927f6ad987ca6a9fb2deSells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:fe7bd4d0fc0ab1c39ad3908d27a93c457395aeb9b44c927f6ad987ca6a9fb2deThe app's own text says: "Sign in"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:fe7bd4d0fc0ab1c39ad3908d27a93c457395aeb9b44c927f6ad987ca6a9fb2de380 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Trash graphics and very hard controls and the game gives you ads after every one minute and overall very few things to say nice about this game considering this game has nice things to say about Goofy ahh old and trash SCP game💀💀
Waaaaaay to many ads, I get ads every 30 seconds, which is annoying and is unbearable. tho still is a good game.
thought it was a different version and too many adds
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 0.39b Alpha, scanned 29 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 0.39b Alpha of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 0.39b Alpha, updated 2025-11-02.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
scpAssessed 2026-10-30 from 380 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.