Hard to cancel
2 independent sources agreeHard to cancel: raised by 17 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 24 reviews we read)
Definition
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Screen Mirroring Z is an Android app designed to help users mirror their phon…
EVOLLY GLOBALSerious warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.9.7 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 2.9.8, updated 2026-10-24.





Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Screen Mirroring Z is an Android app designed to help users mirror their phone's screen wirelessly to any smart TV with no delay. With its simple user interface, it's the perfect tool for making presentations, watching movies, or playing games on a larger screen. The app is compatible with a wide range of TV models, including Roku, Samsung, LG, Sony, Chromecast, FireTV, TCL, Vizio, and Hisense.
To use Screen Mirroring Z, ensure your phone and TV are connected to the same WIFI network, tap the "connect" button, and start casting your photos, videos, and audio files to your TV. You can also cast Youtube videos and media files from Google Drive, as well as photos from Google Photos. Additionally, the app supports streaming IPTV channels to TVs.
Screen Mirroring Z is compatible with Chromecast, WebOS, DLNA, Miracast, and other TVs that support these protocols.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Hard to cancel: raised by 17 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 24 reviews we read)
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Upgrade or watch a video to continue"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:73243d255978eac7d94de29395c11a52922f3624e440bd3d9b8335d7b19978feThe app's own text says: "Upgrade or watch a video to continue"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Package artefact
sha256:73243d255978eac7d94de29395c11a52922f3624e440bd3d9b8335d7b19978fe400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
This is a horrible app!!! It wouldn't connect to my ROKU TV. I couldn't get past the page that kept asking for a code that I was never able to find. The QR codes kept popping up on the screen, then it asked for the 4-digit code over and…
Cannot get it to do anything but charge me a fee. Do not get this app. Update: You cannot cancel this service. They will charge your credit card until you cancel it. Buyer Beware!!
Hard very hard to unsubscribe.Follow this steps : remember to lock your card too just in case 1. once you get in this section look at Right below the app where it says more info 2. where it says EVEYONE IN APP PURCHASES - click where it…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 2.9.7, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.9.7 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 2.9.8, updated 2026-10-24.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
screen-mirroring-zAssessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.