Appworthy

Seal of Fate

A Dazzling Fate Awaits

Ujoy Games Limited
Download on theApp StoreGet it onGoogle Play
App Store rating4.8★3.1K ratings
Google Play rating4.3★17.6K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app $0.99–$29.99
Age12+Store age rating
Size3,978 MBiPhone download
CategoryGames
DeveloperUjoy Games Limited

What we found

Full report

Some warnings 20 users report having to pay to progress; 5 users report ads that misrepresent the app. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.

Money

Pressure and ad claims

From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 1.67.042989 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-30 .

The store currently lists version 1.67.042989, updated 2026-08-21.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Seal of Fate is a dazzling 3D anime fantasy RPG. Immerse yourself into a world that surpasses all your imaginations, where destiny meets desire. Along the path of fate, dazzling beauties await your choice. Whose fate will intertwine with yours?…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

1 published · 2 shown, not confirmed

Positives 1

Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.

Developer says data deletion can be requested

Measured

The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

Sources
The store listing
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
From the Google Play listing
Definition

The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.

Open evidence

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app

One source only

Misleading advertising: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 80 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From Google Play reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
1.3% of the 400 reviews read.

Pay to progress

One source only

Pay to progress: raised by 20 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 20 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From Google Play reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
5.0% of the 400 reviews read.

Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.

What reviewers report

400 reviews read · 2 review-based observations

400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Reports that the ads misrepresent the app

Shown, not confirmed

Absolute trash. Trailer for pre-release said it was an open world game, which its not. false advertisement should be brought down and deleted

1★ · Google Play · 2025-09-04

terrible with fake ad of open world

1★ · Google Play · 2025-12-22

fake advertising final boss; watched a 31 minute long video, that's how long it took to just unlock basic summons, and after that you need to spend over 500 rarer currency to unlock "elite summons", you don't get 1000 summons for playing…

1★ · Google Play · 2025-10-26

Pay to progress

Shown, not confirmed

I enjoy this game, and love its characters. I even enjoy its comics even if they only go a few chapters before stopping. on 34 now... what I don't like is that its a money pit, pay to win, possibly even a scam. you can only play for so…

2★ · Google Play · 2025-09-06

Played the game everyday when server 168 opened. Loved it, great animations, great progression. Since the last update the game has become nearly impossible to progress unless you pay for their passes or put money into resources. I can no…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-01-31

I see a lot of comments that say that the game is p2w,but I think these people are wrong. I payed only 1$ to get Khione and I'm in 15 place on the arena and top 100 in the x-server. I love that developers give us options to get new…

5★ · Google Play · 2025-09-13

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

5 measured · 3 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.

Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 30 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 1.67.042989 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-30 .

The store currently lists version 1.67.042989, updated 2026-08-21.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

App Store

Version 1.7 · 2026-08-24
- New Anniversary Version released! Join the Guilded Extravagenza to claim exclusive Anniversary Skin and massive rewards! - New Unic Meowmate Joy and the first Unic Fairy Rere make their debut! - Guild system upgrade, featuring several new gameplays and new Guild Auction system. - New limited-time events Matching-up and Monopoly. - Main Story and Nightmare stages have been expanded with enhanced clear rewards. - Added Quick Skip for stages and optimized Quick Deploy features.

Google Play

Version 1.67.042989 · 2026-08-21

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
seal-of-fate
Assessment date
30 Oct 2026
Sources used
3 independent signals: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
400
Package examined
No package scan
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-30 from 400 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-30 Version analyzed: 1.67.0429893 independent signals400 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.14Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.

Store facts

App Store · Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

App Store

Store rating
4.80 ★ · 3,094 ratings
Version
1.7
Updated
24 Aug 2026
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
12+
Size
3,978 MB
Open in App Store

Google Play

Store rating
4.33 ★ · 17,621 ratings
Version
1.67.042989
Updated
21 Aug 2026
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
12+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
Ujoy Games Limited
Category
Games
Listing price
Free · In-app purchases

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells

From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.

Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices. The list below covers the other store only.
One-off packs10
Medium Bundle 4Pack$4.99
Small Bundle 3Pack$0.99
Small Bundle 4Pack$1.49
Medium Bundle 1Pack$1.99
Large Bundle 3Pack$9.99
Large Bundle 5Pack$14.99
Medium Bundle 3Pack$2.99
Deluxe Bundle 1Pack$19.99
Medium Bundle 2Pack$2.49
Deluxe Bundle 3Pack$29.99
This list is cut off. Apple shows at most 10 in-app purchases, and this app is at the limit — so it very likely sells more than we can see.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.
Review thresholds Read the methodology For developers

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.

Report a factual error — free Email a correction