Too little checked to say Only 338 reviews read, too few to say.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 27.0.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 27.0.0, updated 2026-10-08.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Setgraph is the fast, no-fuss way to track your lifts and actually achieve progressive overload. Log a set in seconds, then watch your strength climb on clear, real-time graphs. Built for lifters of all levels, it stays simple and quick, so logging never gets in the way of training.
Features
Fast and Simple
• Instantly log sets with minimal taps, saving time and keeping you focused on your workout.
• Record supersets, circuits, and multisets together, so grouped movements stay fast to log.
• Rest timers start automatically after recording a set and are accessible from your Lock Screen or Dynamic Island.
• Manage weights effortlessly with Smart Plates, which calculate totals instantly.
• Swipe to replicate previous sets or log new ones with ease.
• Use the “Next Set Due” notification to stay on track without reopening the app.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Facts that add context without being a charge.
In-app purchases run from USD 4.99 to USD 199.99 — a 40x spread across 3 items
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 27.0.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 27.0.0, updated 2026-10-08.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Apple Watch Sessions Start a session on iPhone and Apple Watch takes it over, with live heart rate and heart rate zones on your wrist. Pause, resume, or finish from either device, and the two stay in step even if one of them restarts. Add Setgraph to your watch face with the new complication, and find your recent activities at the top of the list. Made for iPhone Duo On the bigger screen, the Log tab shows your exercises and the one you're logging side by side, and summaries, body stats, and more use two columns. Setgraph also reopens right where you left off. Redesigned AI Planner Pick your priority and the body areas to target, then watch your plan come together. Timers in the Tab Bar…
Shortened here; the full notes are on the store listing.
Appworthy
setgraphAssessed 2026-10-27 from 338 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.