Skincare ASMR: Makeover Game is a satisfying mix of skincare, makeup, and mak…
CAT StudioSerious warnings 2 confirmed warnings, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 368 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 0.0.10 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 0.0.10, updated 2026-10-09.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Skincare ASMR: Makeover Game is a satisfying mix of skincare, makeup, and makeover mini-games where you transform everything step by step.
Clean, fix, and transform everything from messy skin to perfect beauty looks, from simple touch-ups to full makeovers. Every mini-game is crafted to deliver that addictive “so satisfying” feeling with soft ASMR sounds, smooth visuals, and simple, antistress gameplay 💖
🎮 Game Features:
💆Skincare ASMR & Face Care 💕
Gently cleanse, remove pimples, and treat the skin with soft, relaxing steps—watch every little detail fade away as the face becomes smooth, fresh.
💄 Makeover ASMR & Makeup Studio ✨
Mix and match cute, fancy makeup styles—soft blush, glossy lipstick, sparkly eyeshadow, and dreamy lashes. Watch your character shine under the spotlight like a true star on the runway.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:aace9367ae80f54bb121df4892c153a9e37036db788440fd1e2666d0150d51b6Aggressive ad load: raised by 93 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 4 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:aace9367ae80f54bb121df4892c153a9e37036db788440fd1e2666d0150d51b6Misleading advertising: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 61 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
The app's own text says: "Continue playing"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:aace9367ae80f54bb121df4892c153a9e37036db788440fd1e2666d0150d51b6368 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
good but too many ads
Couldn't even get to START the first level without a forced ad. Ads popped up taking the bottom 4th of the screen twice during the first level. Don't waste your time downloading this.
Deleting this after 1 level of play. The amount of time given to finish a level is not enough time considering the control of the tools is not good. The ads are ridiculous and they will freeze so you have to exit the game and reload…
the ads are misleading. no challenge, very repetitive. the controls are terrible and the ads are very dominant. horrible, low-rent slop.
nothing like the ad
not like advertised
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 0.0.10, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 0.0.10 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 0.0.10, updated 2026-10-09.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
skincare-asmr-google-com-skincare-makeup-makeover-asmr-gameAssessed 2026-10-26 from 368 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.