Sky Gamblers: Storm Raiders

Prizewinning WWI dogfights

Atypical Games
App Store rating4.5★1.6K ratings
Google Play rating3.9★14.3K ratings
Price$4.99In-app $0.99–$2.99
Age12+ · 9+App Store · Google Play
Size854 MBiPhone download
CategoryGames

What we found

Full report

Too little checked to say Only reviews have been read so far (400 reviews). The app itself hasn’t been analysed.

Money

From review signals only, 27 Oct 2026.

App Store. The store currently lists version 1.5.12, updated 2026-02-10.

Google Play. The store currently lists version 1.0.5, updated 2016-04-13.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Design Award 2013 Winner!

Launched as Editor's choice on the AppStore!

Slide To Play - 4 out of 4

AppSpy - 5 out of 5

PocketGamer - Gold Award

Digitally Downloaded - 4.5 out of 5

iReviewT - 10 out of 10

PocketGamer - "Gorgeous to look at and with a control system to suit every taste"

Digitally Downloaded - "a true home console experience to iOS"

Slide To Play - "hits the sweet spot between arcade and sim"

AppSpy - "pairing gorgeous visuals and rock-solid controls"

THIS IS THE ULTIMATE WWII AIR COMBAT GAME! You’ll participate in visceral dogfights, protect

cities and fleets, bomb enemy structures and even fly through tunnels. Everything is set up in accurately

recreated real life locations like Pearl Harbor, Coast of Dover, Midway, Germany and France.…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

No findings published
No findings are published for this listing. These are review signals, not findings: nothing here is an assessment.

No recurring theme reached our reporting threshold in the reviews we scanned.

What reviewers report

400 reviews read · 0 review signals

400 reviews scanned. These are signals from public reviews, not findings. Nothing here is an assessment.

No recurring theme reached our reporting threshold in the reviews we scanned. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.

Measurements

5 measured · 3 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
No theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
Under 65% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.

Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Review signals only

Review signals only. No automated analysis of the app itself has been run, so there is no analysed version to report; the signals were read from public reviews on 27 Oct 2026.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

App Store

Version 1.5.12 · 2026-02-10
Restored the playing of music

Google Play

Version 1.0.5 · 2016-04-13

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Review signals only
App identifier
sky-gamblers-apple-574375380
Review signals scanned
27 Oct 2026
Sources used
User reviews
Reviews read
400
Package examined
No package scan
Human inspection
Not completed
How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

Store facts

App Store · Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

App Store

Store rating
4.55 ★ · 1,632 ratings
Version
1.5.12
Updated
10 Feb 2026
Price
$4.99
Age rating
12+
Size
854 MB
Open in App Store

Google Play

Store rating
3.88 ★ · 14,307 ratings
Version
1.0.5
Updated
13 Apr 2016
Price
$4.99
Age rating
9+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
Atypical Games
Category
Games
Listing price
$4.99

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells

From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.

Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices. The list below covers the other store only.
One-off packs2
Starter Mega PackPack$1.99
Acrobatic PackPack$0.99
Show 8 more purchases we couldn’t categorise

These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.

Weapon CustomizeTerm not stated$1.99
Plane Paint CustomizationTerm not stated$1.99
Horten Ho 229Term not stated$1.99
P-80 Shooting StarTerm not stated$1.99
Plane P47Term not stated$2.99
DH Vampire MK1Term not stated$1.99
Meteor F8Term not stated$0.99
Plane He162 SalamanderTerm not stated$1.99
This list is cut off. Apple shows at most 10 in-app purchases, and this app is at the limit — so it very likely sells more than we can see.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How a review signal works

A review signal is produced automatically from public app reviews by a classifier — never by a hands-on Appworthy test, and never by a human analyst. It exists so a real, not-yet-audited app can carry more than a blank “Not yet tested” listing, without ever being mistaken for an assessment.

A theme only appears above once at least 5 distinct reviews corroborate it — one angry review can never tag an app. These thresholds are published settings and may be tuned as coverage grows.

It carries no confirmed findings — reviews are one kind of evidence, and nothing here has been hands-on tested. The moment Appworthy publishes a full assessment of this app, it replaces this signal, permanently.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A human review replaces this review-derived signal with hands-on, recorded measurements. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.