The Smart Printer App · Air Print is your all-in-one printing solution, makin…
FirstOrder.AISome warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 460 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 21 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.1.9 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-21 .
The store currently lists version 1.1.9, updated 2026-09-29.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
The Smart Printer App · Air Print is your all-in-one printing solution, making it easy to print documents, photos, webpages, notes and more directly from your iPhone or iPad. Whether at home, in the office, or on the go, enjoy seamless and efficient printing with just a few taps! This smart printer supports multiple models from a wide range of printer manufacturers and brands.
Key Features:
-Search & Connect to Your Printer
Quickly search and find printers in the mobile network, display them on the home page, and show real-time paper and ink status.
-Scan & Print Various Files Effortlessly
Smart print photos, documents, websites, Notes, contacts, iCloud files and more in just a few clicks.
-Scan & Edit PDFs
Scan with your phone camera or directly with your printer, scan documents or photos & save as PDFs, and edit before printing.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 5 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: AppLovin MAX, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), InMobi, Pangle (ByteDance) and 1 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:58fdedbee587d58965b80b85442de8654203d3c2536416975343255de94d9b97Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "One time purchase"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
sha256:58fdedbee587d58965b80b85442de8654203d3c2536416975343255de94d9b97The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Offers a free trial ("Free Trial") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:58fdedbee587d58965b80b85442de8654203d3c2536416975343255de94d9b97Aggressive ad load: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 77 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
460 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
I wanted to print but it says I have to pay a Subscriprion, and it is full of ads, I don't even know if printing is it's main goal
Too many ads
Too much ads
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.1.9, scanned 21 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.1.9 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-21 .
The store currently lists version 1.1.9, updated 2026-09-29.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
1. Added manual duplex printing function. 2. Fixed minor bugs and improved overall experience.
No release notes were provided for this version.
smart-printer-app-air-printAssessed 2026-10-21 from 460 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.