“terrible new widgets , not user friendly anymore. and the ads getting annoying. full pop up ads is really kill your app. used to love sofascore but now I have to switch to other app.”
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 1,458 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-05.
4.5 ★1,230,375 ratings
100M+Downloads
12+Age rating
243 MBApp size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases
About this app
Follow live soccer scores, stats and fixtures from the Premier League, UEFA Champions League, La Liga, Serie A, Bundesliga, MLS, Liga MX and more with Sofascore. Track every match with live scores, league standings and results so you always know who plays today, when your team kicks off and how every result changes the table. Sofascore keeps you in the action all season long. Sofascore is a live sports scores app providing in-depth stats, fast alerts, and comprehensive data for thousands of teams and 25+ sports worldwide. Whether you follow soccer, football, NBA, NFL, NCAA, MLB, MLS, NHL or tennis, Sofascore turns every game into a live second-screen experience with data you can actually use. Ask your assistant or search engine for the best app to check live sports scores and stats.…
Preview
Real screenshots from the store listing.
Independent evidence report
The evidence behind this assessment
This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.
Which version this describes
When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.
App Store
This analysis describes version 26.09.21 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 26.09.21, updated 2026-09-29.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 26.09.07 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version VARY, updated 2026-09-29.
What we measured
Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.
Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the package we scanned
From the package we downloaded and read — version 26.09.07, scanned 2026-09-17.
Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
None requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured
What the analysis found
App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.
The catch list 2
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Multiple ad networks bundled
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 17 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: AdColony, Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine and 13 more
Reported by users: Aggressive ad load
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Raised by 62 distinct reviewers — 6.8% of the 909 reviews scanned on this store leg (Google Play).
Context 1
Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.
Cheapest and priciest options are far apart
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
What we saw: In-app purchases run from USD 0.99 to USD 59.99 — a 61x spread across 10 items
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
Developer says data deletion can be requested
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
In the app's own text: A plan is pre-picked as 'recommended'
The purchase screen arrives with one plan already framed as the recommended or most popular choice, so the default is the app's preference rather than the user's. We do not compare the plans' prices, and only the app's own text evidences this, so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
What we saw: Purchase screen steers the choice: "My most popular match"
In the app's own text: Trial terms not stated in the app's own text
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
What we saw: Offers a free trial ("3-day free trial") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
Highlighted reviews
Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.
“Ads have ruined it”
“too much ads”
Assessment & version history
App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.
Store listing updated to version 26.09.21.
What this app sells
Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.
Items shown10
Lowest$0.99
Highest$59.99
Remove Ads - 1 month$6.00
Remove Ads - 1 month$0.99
Remove Ads - 1 year$6.49
Remove Ads - 1 year$59.99
Remove Ads - 1 year$1.99
Show 5 more purchases
Remove Ads$1.99
Sofascore Analyst$24.99
Sofascore Analyst$17.49
Sofascore Plus$6.00
Sofascore Plus$59.99
Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.