Some warnings 12 users report an aggressive ad load. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 500 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 10.5 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 10.5, updated 2026-10-19.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
PLAY NOW! 10000000 Players!
Relaxing & Addictive FREE Classic Solitaire Card Games just for you! Enjoy the best free Solitaire or Patience game in the world
Solitaire Card Games by Solitaire Games Free Inc is the original iPhone and iPad game for adults, seniors and all ages!
The solitaire card games is a Classic Solitaire experience that trains your brain. Challenge yourself with solitaire card games anywhere, you can play solitaire games free anytime!
Features of Solitaire Games:
- Play unlimited games for free! No lives!
- Solitare draw 1 card
- Solitare draw 3 cards
- Cards are easy to read
- Tap on a card or drag a card to move it
- Automatically save your best time and your total wins!
- 100% winnable decks…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 12 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 42 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
The store privacy disclosure (3 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
500 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
What happened — Not as enjoyable bc the app wants updated all the time. It never used to be this way. Too many interruptions and too many ads for other games.
Fewer ads but still a banner that’s super distracting — I love that there aren’t as many ads between games but the banner at the top is so overstimulating. And the only way to turn it off is to pay $25 A YEAR! I would rather just pay for…
Too many ads — So annoying. You have to wait forever to click through them.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 10.5 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 10.5, updated 2026-10-19.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Classic Solitaire with Landscape and Portrait mode support. - Improved iPad support - Landscape & Portrait - UI/UX Improvements. - New Card Designs. - Enhanced Offline Mode, No Wifi Support. Thank you for choosing Solitaire Card Games, Please share with your friends!
Appworthy
solitaire-card-gamesAssessed 2026-10-26 from 500 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.