★Do you like playing Classic Solitaire, Klondike solitaire, Spider Solitaire,…
Solitaire Card StudioSerious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.1.112 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.1.112, updated 2026-01-20.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
★Do you like playing Classic Solitaire, Klondike solitaire, Spider Solitaire, Tripeaks Solitaire, Pyramid Solitaire, Mahjong Solitaire, FreeCell Solitaire, and any Patience solitaire card game?
★Are you looking for a better classic solitaire card game to relax your mind and train your brain?
Solitaire - Classic Klondike Solitaire Card Game by Solitaire Card Studio is very addicting and challenging. Our classic free solitaire card game with the unique gameplay of “Garden” is a good choice for relaxing and brain-storming!
"Solitaire" typically refers to Klondike Solitaire. It’s one of the most popular classic card games in the world, and the best-known solitaire card game in the US and Canada. Klondike Solitaire is also known as a Patience card game. People play the Klondike Solitaire card game as an exercise in patience.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 12 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Chartboost, Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange and 8 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:9752eb12c5a89b60418a6ae10776f74c878a922b8270d861ee40eb5d6f39b8b9Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Watch a video to earn a reward!"
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:9752eb12c5a89b60418a6ae10776f74c878a922b8270d861ee40eb5d6f39b8b9Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "No thanks"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:9752eb12c5a89b60418a6ae10776f74c878a922b8270d861ee40eb5d6f39b8b9The app's own text says: "View the ad you saved when you were offline"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:9752eb12c5a89b60418a6ae10776f74c878a922b8270d861ee40eb5d6f39b8b9400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Oct, 2024 for past 2 days, the minute I open this app, I get an ad. Then I click to start a game and get the same ad again. Way too many ads are also popping up while actually in a game. Frustrating!2026- now if I hesitate to make my next…
I'm enjoying the game but i really don't like the Pop up ads everytime you have to start a new level and just a little hint you should automatically receive the time's 7 gold coins instead of having to watch the same ads over And over…
Good game but too many ads.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.1.112, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.1.112 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.1.112, updated 2026-01-20.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
solitaire-klondike-card-gamesAssessed 2026-10-26 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.