Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 441 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.42.305 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 1.42.305, updated 2026-08-04.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Solitaire Puzzle Card Games offers the perfect classic card experience, thoughtfully designed for visual comfort and mental engagement. With its clear, large-card design and smooth gameplay, it provides a relaxing yet stimulating puzzle perfect for unwinding on your phone or tablet.
Why You’ll Love Solitaire Puzzle Card Games
• Big & Clear Cards – Extra-large cards and bold fonts make every move easy on the eyes, reducing strain and boosting enjoyment.
• Stay Sharp, Play Smart – A delightful brain-training exercise that enhances focus, problem-solving, and mental agility—perfect for daily mindfulness.
• True Classic Gameplay – Faithful to the original Solitaire rules you know and love, with the option to play Draw 1 or Draw 3 for just the right challenge.
• Intuitive & Effortless – Simple tap-and-drag controls and a clean layout let you focus on the fun, whether you’re new to Solitaire…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:9308bb5a479628b93022388c790a2a33ca93c6d1d27d533d996091fecd3bbf4dAggressive ad load: raised by 20 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 22 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Please press "Continue" if you choose to start using our app."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:9308bb5a479628b93022388c790a2a33ca93c6d1d27d533d996091fecd3bbf4d441 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
to many adds
too many ads and in app purchases
to many ads
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.42.305, scanned 21 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.42.305 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 1.42.305, updated 2026-08-04.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Bug fixes.
No release notes were provided for this version.
solitaire-puzzle-card-gamesAssessed 2026-10-30 from 441 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.