Some warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 2 more things. Checked: 448 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 57.2.2 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 57.3.0, updated 2026-10-20.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Welcome to Solitaire Story: Ava's Manor, a free relaxing solitaire and story game where every level helps continue the storyline. Play solitaire levels, participate in merge events, restore the manor, unlock rooms, and follow Ava's journey through mystery and romance.
Ava is an author struggling to write her next mystery novel when she inherits her great uncle’s manor. But the manor is hiding more than dusty furniture. As you restore each room, you'll uncover mysterious clues, reveal long-kept secrets, and follow Ava's story as she finds new love and rediscovers her passion for writing. Every solitaire level unravels more of the mystery and reveals the truth hidden within the walls of Blackwood Manor.
Complete card puzzles to earn rewards, choose furniture, uncover hidden secrets, and keep the story moving. Play solitaire levels offline, anytime.
Features:…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:d42d24ee938740f0e942129e48f5c4a37a1cece8ccb0a8a31b74fd6b587dcc53Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Ships session-recording SDK (Smartlook) that can replay on-screen activity
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app ships session-recording or a wide tracking stack, holds permissions that read personal data, or is reported by users to sell, leak or over-collect it. The evidence line says which of those was observed.
Package artefact
sha256:d42d24ee938740f0e942129e48f5c4a37a1cece8ccb0a8a31b74fd6b587dcc53Pay to progress: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 56 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 75 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
The app's own text says: "Please press "Continue" if you choose to start using our app."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:d42d24ee938740f0e942129e48f5c4a37a1cece8ccb0a8a31b74fd6b587dcc53448 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Has great graphics and a fun, well-written story; however, once reaching card deal 116, it becomes almost impossible - unless you're a coin hoarder or spend real $$ for more coins. Yes, there's ways to get free coins, but it's a slog when…
I like the fix the rooms up. However, I said it once, I will say it again. you should not win less coins than it takes to play. That is not winning. Most likely I will be uninstalling this game. To bad I like card games, the story is ok…
Story is quite good, but definitely a pay to win. Need coins to play, you don't recoup after winning a level, levels are impossible to win unless the game AI gives you the right cards, or unless you spend MORE coins to win. Yes, you can…
At first you do make progress and can fix up the first room and meet the characters. Once you move to the upstairs room you end up watching so many advertisements just to play one solitaire game. It's pretty annoying.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 57.2.2, scanned 21 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 57.2.2 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 57.3.0, updated 2026-10-20.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Ava and Cooper find themselves standing at the edge of their most ambitious project yet. Doubts creep in… is this finally the one that’s too big to handle? Olive is stepping into her new role, and the challenges ahead are anything but simple. Continue the story today!
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
solitaire-story-apple-1479573445Assessed 2026-10-30 from 448 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.