Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.1.15 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 1.1.15, updated 2026-02-16.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
If you wish to relax after a long day at work or a long commute, playing with water and liquid is the most relaxing thing you can do! It’s proven that it helps with your well-being, it reduces your stress level and it calms you down. It’s almost like a therapeutic, ASMR experience but accessible directly on your mobile and completely free of charge. Are you ready to experience a brand new relaxing gaming experience with a Sort Liquid : Water Challenge ?
How to play:
- Tap on a bottle to pour its contents into another one, but remember, you can only pour water of the same color, and each bottle should contain only one color.
- A bottle can only contain a certain amount of water. When it’s full you cannot pour more water.
- No timer, no stress, take your time.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:aa74e647826d0c6a091135feafc55c5b8815e85da8518f2bd3e7f590ff210026Aggressive ad load: raised by 14 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 29 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
I loved this game till about a month ago. There started being too many ads and if I had to stop in the middle of a puzzle when I opened the puzzle again my game was wiped out and I had to start a new puzzle. Veey annoying. I will be…
this is terrible, everytime an ad comes up there is no way to close out!! then it takes you to play store but can't get back to game and have to close it . this whole ad thing is getting ridiculous!!!
An interesting concept, but it could do with refinement: - Have different move count targets for gold, silver, etc. or points for movement and time, like Solitaire. - Instead of making me wait to restart the game or watch an unskippable…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.1.15, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.1.15 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 1.1.15, updated 2026-02-16.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
- SDK updates - Performance improvement - Rating flow update
No release notes were provided for this version.
sort-liquidAssessed 2026-10-30 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.