Stick Red And Blue is an addictive puzzle game where you have to embody both…
ABI GAMESerious warnings 3 confirmed warnings. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.8.3 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 2.8.5, updated 2026-08-10.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Stick Red And Blue is an addictive puzzle game where you have to embody both characters. Control both sticks at the same time and use the buttons to move, push boxes, and collect coins to find the exit in the jungle.
On a beautiful day, Red Stick and Blue Stick went out together in the forest, they accidentally got lost in the maze. There are many pitfalls here and they must be overcome before they can go home. Two sticks have to solve many tasks of the maze puzzle. Join them on an adventure, escape the forest and return home safely.
In this cool collaboration game, Fire Red Stick can handle incredible blazes while his companion, Water Blue Stick can keep things cool with her marvelous sea-going capacities. Red Stick can slide across cold surfaces yet this hot kid going to struggle to scale any inclines that have snow on them. Red Stick will slide directly off.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
The store privacy disclosure (4 entries) names no tracking or advertising use, but the package ships 20 advertising/tracking SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, AppMetrica, AppsFlyer
Tracking or advertising SDKs are present in the package that the store's own privacy disclosure does not account for.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:0829e96917dd7425e34ba042234198235d0b501a4d6294b555332fb1cef37cb9Aggressive ad load: raised by 22 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 18 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Offers a trial ("%1$.2fx") and states no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:0829e96917dd7425e34ba042234198235d0b501a4d6294b555332fb1cef37cb9The app's own text says: "Continue as %1$s"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:0829e96917dd7425e34ba042234198235d0b501a4d6294b555332fb1cef37cb9The app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:0829e96917dd7425e34ba042234198235d0b501a4d6294b555332fb1cef37cb9400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
This game is awesome but after 70 level it started hanging and too many ads .😡😡
The ads are ridiculous. This game would've been fun without this many ads.
I like this game but too many adds and when I want to go next stage i have to pay in game
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 2.8.3, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.8.3 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 2.8.5, updated 2026-08-10.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
stick-red-boy-and-blue-girlAssessed 2026-10-26 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.