No specific positive published.
From our automated analysis, 16 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.48.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-16 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.48.0, updated 2026-10-07.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Suck It Up is the oddly satisfying black hole puzzle where you guide your hungry hole to swallow everything in sight! Explore levels across grass, ice, sand, and water as cute animals scatter around your ever-growing hole. Relax, solve clever puzzles, have holesome fun, and become a master of the hole!
Why you’ll love it:
-Satisfying gameplay — drag, slide, and suck it up as your hole grows with every swallow.
-Variety of locations — swallow your way across the world! Parks, sandy beaches, lakes — there’s no place that the hole wouldn’t reach!
-Solve puzzles — sort and swallow only what’s required, and find ways to collect the biggest objects.
-Animal antics — cute pets react as your black hole swallows them.
-Relax or compete — zen out at your own pace or speed through for a perfect score.
-Boost your hole — use handy boosters to slow down time or suck things up faster.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Misleading advertising: raised by 64 distinct reviewers (12.8% of 500 reviews scanned)
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (1.6% of 500 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
500 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Raised by 64 distinct reviewers — 12.8% of the 500 reviews scanned on this store leg (App Store).
Ads lie about timer — I’ve been enjoying the game, but I don’t love that the ads lied about no timer. The first 10 or so levels had no timer, but after that every level has had one. They have special “lotus levels” that don’t further the…
False advertising — Game promised no timer, no stress but after initial 10 levels (and a 5 star review I initially gave due to the lack of a timer), boom, timer. And stress. So disappointed. I really wanted to keep playing this one but…
Timed Levels — Game is advertised as “no timers, no stress” but after the first few levels they become timed. It’s a fun and cute game, but the false advertising is frustrating.
Disappointed — TOO MANY ADS! Not worth my time to watch all these ads! Why can’t you just make games like this where we DO NOT HAVE TO PAY FOR NO ADS!
Impressed — Found this game through Venmo’s play and earn “section”. These “hole” games are popping up everywhere, and I really like some of them. HOWEVER, I *•* LOVE *•* this one! No ads forced on you, and the ones you choose to watch…
Great Hole Game — It has lots of ads, but it’s fun & interesting!
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.48.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-16 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.48.0, updated 2026-10-07.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Bug fixes and improvements.
Bug fixes and improvements.
Bug fixes and improvements.
Appworthy
suck-it-up-tm-apple-6749577557Assessed 2026-10-16 from 500 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.