Welcome to Sudoku Times, the ultimate brain-teasing puzzle experience!
Infinite Joy Ltd.Some warnings 12 users report an aggressive ad load. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 219 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.5.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 2.5.0, updated 2026-05-15.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Welcome to Sudoku Times, the ultimate brain-teasing puzzle experience! Dive into our beautifully crafted game, designed to cater to both beginners and Sudoku veterans. Whether you're looking to kill time or engage in a serious number-crunching session, Sudoku Times is your go-to choice. Available on many devices, play anytime, anywhere, even without Wi-Fi!
🌟 Features
- Multiple Difficulty Levels: Choose from Easy, Medium, Hard, Expert or Master. Perfect for gradually improving your puzzle-solving skills or pushing them to the limits!
- Customizable Gameplay: Enjoy our user-friendly interface with features like Dark Mode for night-time play and larger numbers for easy visibility.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 12 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 18 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
219 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Way. Too. Many. Ads. Holy hell, batman. So many unskipable ads. Pause the game? 3 ads before you can resume, even if you only paused for 30 seconds. Ads before the game. Ads after the game ends. Feel like I downloaded a 90s infomercial…
I like this game but the adverts are off putting. An ad when you finish a puzzle and an ad before you start the next one. Some ads are over 60 seconds and cannot be skipped. Would give 5 stars but can't get past the ads so 3
Forced ads are full ads not pop ups, I understand having them, but forced ads should be no more than 5 to 8 seconds not 15 or more, delete game
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.5.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 2.5.0, updated 2026-05-15.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
sudoku-timesAssessed 2026-10-26 from 219 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.