All 32 teams, all season, with lightning-fast NFL scores, live play-by-play,…
Superfan SportsSerious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 31 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 13.5.8 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 13.5.8, updated 2026-10-13.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
All 32 teams, all season, with lightning-fast NFL scores, live play-by-play, instant alerts, schedules, standings, injuries, and the stats that actually matter. All the essentials, all in one place.
You can also go beyond the box score with pregame analysis, quarterback matchups, trench battles, win probabilities, weather impact and game recaps.
NFL Scores, Play-by-Play and Alerts
• Lightning-fast NFL scores for every game, every week
• Follow every drive with live play-by-play, big plays, turnovers, and momentum swings
• Instant alerts for scores, red zone trips, close games and more
• Track standings, wild card races, and the playoff picture
• A football scoreboard built for the full slate, with every live game easy to scan…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 9 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), InMobi and 5 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:29ba301ac081b5ee000d2f202a7fa92197c63bb8106196c3402350a6ad71999cAggressive ad load: raised by 11 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 36 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Offers a trial ("Go Premium") and states no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:29ba301ac081b5ee000d2f202a7fa92197c63bb8106196c3402350a6ad71999cThe app's own text says: "Got it"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:29ba301ac081b5ee000d2f202a7fa92197c63bb8106196c3402350a6ad71999cThe app's own text says: "Download"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:29ba301ac081b5ee000d2f202a7fa92197c63bb8106196c3402350a6ad71999c400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
The ads are ridiculous (you'll see 3 just scrolling through the teams playing this week) and they want you to pay every year to remove them. On top of this, some of the ali Express ads will straight up intrusively open up the APP if it's…
full screen ads force you to close the app. look for an alternative
way too many ads it's just ridiculous
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 13.5.8, scanned 30 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 13.5.8 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 13.5.8, updated 2026-10-13.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
superfan-sports-google-com-scores-schedule-stats-football-nflAssessed 2026-10-31 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.