Appworthy
Pay to progress
Reported by 168 usersPay to progress: raised by 168 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 12 reviews we read)
Definition
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
App Store rating4.8★29.9K ratings
Google Play rating4.6★186.2K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app $4.99–$89.99
Age17+ · 9+App Store · Google Play
Size110 MBiPhone download
CategoryGames
DeveloperStillfront Supremacy GmbH
What we found
Full reportSerious warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 2,001 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
Money
- Free to download · in-app purchases $4.99–$89.99 (10 listed, the most the App Store shows). Monthly plans $4.99 (about $60 a year), $34.99 (about $420 a year), $44.99 (about $540 a year) and $89.99 (about $1080 a year). Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices.
- Pay to progressConfirmed · reported by 168 users
- If you subscribe through the store, cancel in iPhone Settings → your name → Subscriptions or Google Play → Payments & subscriptions → Subscriptions. Deleting the app doesn’t cancel a subscription.
From our automated analysis, 31 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 0.233 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 0.233, updated 2026-10-08.
Preview
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
About this app
The world is on the brink of war. Tank clashes, Naval battles, Air combat. In Supremacy: Call of War 1942 you decide the course of history!
Play as the leader of one nation when a worldwide conflict seems inevitable. It all boils down to one question: What is your strategy?
Take control of one of the mighty nations during WWII. Conquer provinces, forge alliances and build up your economy. Research top secret weapons of World War 2 and become the one true superpower! Diplomatic alliances, or ruthless expansion, secret weapons or mass assault? Choose your own path to victory!
Supremacy: Call of War 1942 offers a one of a kind gameplay environment to simulate worldwide conflicts on many different multiplayer scenarios. Control and develop a huge military and jump into matches with hundreds of other players.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The full report
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings and evidence
Things to watch for 1
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Open evidence
Positives 1
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Developer says data deletion can be requested
MeasuredThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
Definition
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What reviewers report
2,001 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Pay to progress
Published findingRaised by 168 distinct reviewers — about 1 in 12 reviews we read on this store leg (Google Play).
A game where players become politics making choices that could lead them to victory or disaster. Also those PW2 players are examples of real life rich folks who would pay to win at any cost. So that's reality for you players who can't win…
5 STAR REVIEWS ARE FROM PREMIUM PLAYERS ONLY,except me. Game is p2w there's also double accounting and also watch out theres a in-game mod called 'The CaptainBlood" quite toxic with a massive ego. refuses to help random and will not…
New content is a bit too focused on monetization and P2W, and the doctrines could use a bit of rebalancing. But overall this is one of the best strategy games available in mobile, with a surprising amount of depth.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Measurements
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
From store data and reviews
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the app package we scanned
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
How we know
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
Versions and dates analysed
This analysis describes version 0.233 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 0.233, updated 2026-10-08.
Store update history
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
App Store
Version 0.247 · 2026-10-27
Improved app stability and performance.
Google Play
Version 0.233 · 2026-10-08
No release notes were provided for this version.
Assessment record
- Status
- Automated analysis
- App identifier
supremacy-apple-1331030677- Assessment date
- 31 Oct 2026
- Sources used
- 3 independent signals: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
- Reviews read
- 2,001
- Package examined
- No package scan
- Human inspection
- Not completed
Assessed 2026-10-31 from 2,001 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
How we know
- Measurement vocabulary
- 1.4
How this page was produced
Analyzed 2026-10-31 Version analyzed: 0.2333 independent signals2,001 reviews scannedConfidence: MediumNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.14Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.
Store facts
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
App Store
- Store rating
- 4.79 ★ · 29,911 ratings
- Version
- 0.247
- Updated
- 27 Oct 2026
- Price
- Free · In-app purchases
- Age rating
- 17+
- Size
- 110 MB
Google Play
- Store rating
- 4.62 ★ · 186,202 ratings
- Version
- 0.233
- Updated
- 8 Oct 2026
- Price
- Free · In-app purchases
- Age rating
- 9+
- Size
- Not supplied
- Developer
- Stillfront Supremacy GmbH
- Category
- Games
- Listing price
- Free · In-app purchases
Purchases the store lists
What this app sells
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
Google Play doesn’t publish per-purchase prices. The list below covers the other store only.
Subscriptions4
Gold and 1 Month HCMonthly$34.99
Gold and 1 Month HCMonthly$44.99
Gold and 1 Month HCMonthly$89.99
1 Month of High CommandMonthly$4.99
One-off packs6
Gold PackagePack$4.99
Gold PackagePack$12.99
Gold PackagePack$24.99
Gold PackagePack$34.99
Gold PackagePack$59.99
Starter PackPack$4.99
This list is cut off. Apple shows at most 10 in-app purchases, and this app is at the limit — so it very likely sells more than we can see.
Method and limits
How the automated analysis works
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Limits of this report
- A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
- Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
- Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
- A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.
Request a correction
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.