Some warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code and the store listing.
From our automated analysis, 24 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.0.49 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store lists the version as varying by device, updated 2026-05-12.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Are you a fan of the original Supreme Duelist game? Then relive the nostalgia of the early days with the 2021 version!
Featuring the same hilarious physics and epic battles, the 2021 version is a throwback to the game's roots. Supreme Duelist is a free-to-play game that provides hours of entertainment. Whether you're a casual gamer or a hardcore player, this game has something for everyone.
This is a very fun multiplayer stick fighting game on mobile, which allows you to use duel and clash with your family and friends at parties on the same device. So, what are you waiting for?
Relive the nostalgia of the 2021 version and download Supreme Duelist now. And don't forget to give us your feedback – we're always working to make the game even better!
Indonesia (IGRS): Pending verification. Self-rated: 13+.
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:69bc60b23c686549bb8ff14504cdf1f6e476b66d18b481fa20a372ca17a96b31Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Finish playing to get rewards"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:69bc60b23c686549bb8ff14504cdf1f6e476b66d18b481fa20a372ca17a96b31Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:69bc60b23c686549bb8ff14504cdf1f6e476b66d18b481fa20a372ca17a96b31No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.0.49, scanned 24 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.0.49 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store lists the version as varying by device, updated 2026-05-12.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
supreme-duelist-2021Assessed 2026-10-24 from 400 user reviews, the app's package and the store listing.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Five independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.