Prepare to dive into the captivating world of "Sushi Sort" , a thrilling addi…
Snap Brain GamesSerious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 356 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 31 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.1300 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 1.1300, updated 2026-09-11.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Prepare to dive into the captivating world of "Sushi Sort" , a thrilling addition to the beloved realm of sushi games! These cutting games aren't just about stacking delicious sushi or crafting as a sushi maker; it's a test of quick-thinking strategy. Satisfy eager customers and evolve into a true slice master in this fresh entertainment experience! Discover an easy-to-play casual game designed for relaxing entertainment and fun gameplay sessions. Perfect for casual gamers seeking stress-free mobile gaming experiences! ✨
How to play:
Navigate through a table overflowing with layered sushi and sushi rolls using sort puzzle logic in sushi sort - select sushi types vertically to complete customer requests. Strategize like a slice master: carefully manage limited counter space while slicing through layers.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 12 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange and 8 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:444b52eec0b241b3a9c61225402efae238f81a6df42febedf3f917b9d9a13a8bAggressive ad load: raised by 42 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 8 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:444b52eec0b241b3a9c61225402efae238f81a6df42febedf3f917b9d9a13a8bOffers a trial ("A free reward is waiting for you in the app.") and states no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:444b52eec0b241b3a9c61225402efae238f81a6df42febedf3f917b9d9a13a8bThe app's own text says: "%d new notifications"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:444b52eec0b241b3a9c61225402efae238f81a6df42febedf3f917b9d9a13a8bThe app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:444b52eec0b241b3a9c61225402efae238f81a6df42febedf3f917b9d9a13a8b356 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
It's a great game with no forced ads for the first 10 levels. The higher levels you achieve, there is an ad after every round. With the difficulty increasing items or revivals also require coins or more ads.
very fun so far, I haven't found ive had to watch a ad every level as someone else had complained
Damn, regret didnt see the reviews first. It is true the game have too many ads. U cant win all level without ads. And theres even have a forceable ads after u finished the game.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.1300, scanned 29 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.1300 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 1.1300, updated 2026-09-11.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
sushi-sort-google-sushi-sort-food-packing-jamAssessed 2026-10-31 from 356 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.