Some warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 419 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 29 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 7.0.30539 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-29 .
The store currently lists version 7.0.30539, updated 2026-08-21.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Play house makeover and playground cleaning game! Clean up & fix the messy house. Clean up the kitchen, tidy up the toilet, wash the dishes, fix and design your dream playground. Feed and dress up your new pet - a little cute kitty. Get new toys for the summer, cute house decorations and play a dress up game!
Have tons of fun playing in the playground and kitchen cleaning games! Learn how to clean up your room, do laundry, clean the bathroom and wash the dishes. Take good care of your pet kitty - play dress up and feed treats! Clean kitty's cat tower and add new toys. Play outside the house too - design your dream playground, clean up your puppy's doghouse, wash the car and more!…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:2fe98d2f7a5cd78dfe966b4659a069ecd5b61455cd3eda8eb0b67842c879a2d5Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 19 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 22 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Offers a free trial ("3 days free trial") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:2fe98d2f7a5cd78dfe966b4659a069ecd5b61455cd3eda8eb0b67842c879a2d5419 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
to many repeated ads. everytime I try to do something and finish. an AD immediately pops up and ruins my time of many things I could do. please get rid of some ADS please. plus I really like the gameplay but cleaning something and it…
it has SOOO many ads and after 2 seconds erased all my progress I didn't even leave the game so I think it's impossible to finish pretty good and REALLY nostalgic✨✨✨💖💖💖💖💖
I love this so much !! Too much ads?,turn off wifi! the game also helps children learn chores ,and why its important! Reccomended
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 7.0.30539, scanned 20 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 7.0.30539 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-29 .
The store currently lists version 7.0.30539, updated 2026-08-21.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
A few improvements & minor tweaks for a smoother player experience!
No release notes were provided for this version.
sweet-oliviaAssessed 2026-10-29 from 419 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.